From: John Gardiner Myers <jgmyers@netscape.com>
To: "Charles 'Buck' Krasic" <krasic@acm.org>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
David Miller <davem@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:59:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAEFA9D.8030200@netscape.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: xu4vg42nmnz.fsf@brittany.cse.ogi.edu
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]
Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote:
>Not exactly. I'm saying that the context in which /dev/epoll is used
>(at least originally), is non-blocking socket IO. Anybody who has
>worked with that API can tell you there are subtleties, and that if
>they're ignored, will certainly lead to pitfalls. These are not the
>fault of the /dev/epoll interface.
>
The particular subtlety I am pointing out is the fault of the currently
defined /dev/epoll interface and can be fixed by making a minor change
to the /dev/epoll interface.
>I agree if you are talking about AIO as a whole. But epoll is more
>limited in its scope, it really relates only to poll()/select not the
>whole IO api.
>
>
My objection to the current /dev/epoll API does apply to said "limited
scope," it is not dependent on the scope that is "AIO as a whole."
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3537 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-17 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 22:36 [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-14 22:54 ` John Myers
2002-10-15 15:05 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 17:06 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-15 17:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 17:18 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-16 2:11 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-10-15 18:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-15 18:53 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-15 18:57 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 20:25 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 21:09 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-15 21:50 ` John Myers
2002-10-15 22:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 22:56 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 23:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-16 19:16 ` John Myers
2002-10-15 21:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 22:01 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 22:27 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 22:36 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 22:41 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 23:26 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 23:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 23:33 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-16 0:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-16 0:15 ` John Myers
2002-10-16 14:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-16 18:15 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-16 19:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-16 23:31 ` epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-16 23:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-17 18:06 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-17 18:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-18 19:02 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-18 19:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 0:55 ` John Myers
2002-10-19 5:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 6:59 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-19 17:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 17:48 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-19 18:52 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-19 20:18 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-19 21:08 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-22 19:35 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-22 20:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-22 21:54 ` Erich Nahum
2002-10-22 22:17 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-22 22:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-18 21:01 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-18 21:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 1:05 ` John Myers
2002-10-19 1:27 ` Tervel Atanassov
2002-10-19 18:52 ` John G. Myers
2002-10-19 4:07 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-16 20:06 ` [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Mark Mielke
2002-10-16 23:48 ` epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-17 0:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-17 17:45 ` John Myers
2002-10-16 2:45 ` [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-16 14:28 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-17 18:47 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-17 19:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-18 3:30 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-16 18:29 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-16 20:39 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-17 17:59 ` John Gardiner Myers [this message]
2002-10-21 16:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 16:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-16 19:59 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-16 20:03 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-17 17:43 ` epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) John Myers
2002-10-18 17:00 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-18 17:28 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-18 17:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-18 18:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-18 19:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 6:56 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-19 16:10 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-22 17:22 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-22 17:46 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-22 17:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-22 18:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 18:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-22 18:37 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-22 19:22 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-22 19:28 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:50 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-22 20:00 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-23 11:10 ` Latest aio code " Suparna Bhattacharya
2002-10-22 20:23 ` async poll John Myers
2002-10-22 18:42 ` epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-22 19:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 16:49 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-23 17:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-23 18:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 21:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-23 21:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 21:39 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-23 21:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 17:49 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-23 18:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 18:32 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-23 20:36 ` async poll John Myers
2002-10-23 20:57 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-23 21:13 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-23 21:23 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-23 21:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 21:51 ` bert hubert
2002-10-23 22:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 21:54 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-23 22:22 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 22:29 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-23 22:50 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-24 7:32 ` Eduardo Pérez
2002-10-24 15:05 ` Charles 'Buck' Krasic
2002-10-23 22:24 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-23 22:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-23 22:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-19 17:19 ` epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5) Davide Libenzi
2002-10-18 18:55 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-18 19:00 ` Mark Mielke
2002-10-15 17:38 ` [PATCH] async poll for 2.5 Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-15 17:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 18:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 18:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-15 19:00 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 19:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 18:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2002-10-15 19:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 19:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 19:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 19:38 ` Dan Kegel
2002-10-15 19:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-15 20:36 ` John Gardiner Myers
2002-10-15 20:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-15 19:02 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAEFA9D.8030200@netscape.com \
--to=jgmyers@netscape.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=krasic@acm.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.