From: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:45:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBE3C92.964AA3C0@splentec.com> (raw)
Wouldn't it make sense to stupulate that the eh_abort_handler()
should NOT call scsi_done() for the command (even with DID_ABORT)?
This behaviour would be consistent with SAM-3 Task Management,
in that when aborted no response should be returned.
--
Luben
reply other threads:[~2002-10-29 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DBE3C92.964AA3C0@splentec.com \
--to=luben@splentec.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.