* Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management
@ 2002-10-29 7:45 Luben Tuikov
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Luben Tuikov @ 2002-10-29 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Wouldn't it make sense to stupulate that the eh_abort_handler()
should NOT call scsi_done() for the command (even with DID_ABORT)?
This behaviour would be consistent with SAM-3 Task Management,
in that when aborted no response should be returned.
--
Luben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-29 7:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-29 7:45 Q: eh_abort_handler and Task Management Luben Tuikov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.