* Network Load Balance
@ 2002-11-25 22:43 Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao)
2002-11-25 22:59 ` Steven Dake
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao) @ 2002-11-25 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lista do kernel
There is any way to make 2 intel ethernet cards working as one, like the
Network Load Balance (NLB - Windows) in the Intel Ethernet adapters with
the Adaptive Load Balance feature on linux?
I know that in windows it works, but in the linux? Anyone has any
ideias?
Joao Reis.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: Network Load Balance
@ 2002-11-25 22:56 Manish Lachwani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manish Lachwani @ 2002-11-25 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joao "Alberto M. dos Reis " "(listas de discucao)',
lista do kernel
Did you try to work with ANS (Advanced Network Service) in the e1000 driver?
bThere is also a utility procfg that ca be used to configure this
Thanks
Manish
-----Original Message-----
From: Joao "Alberto M. dos Reis " "(listas de discucao)
[mailto:lista@vudu.ath.cx]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:44 PM
To: lista do kernel
Subject: Network Load Balance
There is any way to make 2 intel ethernet cards working as one, like the
Network Load Balance (NLB - Windows) in the Intel Ethernet adapters with
the Adaptive Load Balance feature on linux?
I know that in windows it works, but in the linux? Anyone has any
ideias?
Joao Reis.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Network Load Balance
2002-11-25 22:43 Network Load Balance Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao)
@ 2002-11-25 22:59 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-26 18:26 ` [PROPOSAL] " Jeff V. Merkey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Dake @ 2002-11-25 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joao "Alberto M. dos Reis " "(listas de discucao)"
Cc: lista do kernel
Joao,
Your looking for bonding driver, which is in the kernel and also has a
seperate sourceforge project where development works.
Thanks
-steve
Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao) wrote:
>There is any way to make 2 intel ethernet cards working as one, like the
>Network Load Balance (NLB - Windows) in the Intel Ethernet adapters with
>the Adaptive Load Balance feature on linux?
>
>I know that in windows it works, but in the linux? Anyone has any
>ideias?
>
>Joao Reis.
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PROPOSAL] Network Load Balance
2002-11-25 22:59 ` Steven Dake
@ 2002-11-26 18:26 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-11-26 22:26 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff V. Merkey @ 2002-11-26 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Dake
Cc: Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao), lista do kernel
Here is something we did at Novell many years back that worked very well for
load balancing across multiple adapters. This implementation allowed up
to four (4) adapters to function with load balancing. To pull this off,
you need to spoof at the MAC laer and alter the MAC addresses in the
header of received frames to spoof the IP stack above. This method
requires **NO** changes to any protocol stacks above.
All adapters were permitted to receive frames and there was a memory table
that held the MAC address of the first adapter in the load balance
group. For any packets received by any of the adapters, the MAC frame
address was replaced for other receiving adapters with the address of
the primary adapter prior to being pushed up to the protocol stacks.
Any TX packets going outbound to the primary adapter MAC address were
intercepted and round robined out to each of the load balance cards.
Prior to being transmitted, the MAC address in the outbound packets
was changed to match the card the packet would be sent from. This
has the affect of spoofing the remote clients into seeing packets
originate from that particular adapter, and they would answer to that
card MAC address. When the card received the packets, since the MAC address
was being NAT'd, all of the received data would be aliased to appear to
be originating from the first primary adapter.
This model worked great on IPX, and worked fine with ARP and RARP under
IP, although it's not intutive as to why.
At any rate, this is a down and dirty model that would support load
balancing effectively across up to four adapters. It worked very well
for us.
Jeff
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:59:18PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
> Joao,
>
> Your looking for bonding driver, which is in the kernel and also has a
> seperate sourceforge project where development works.
>
> Thanks
> -steve
>
> Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao) wrote:
>
> >There is any way to make 2 intel ethernet cards working as one, like the
> >Network Load Balance (NLB - Windows) in the Intel Ethernet adapters with
> >the Adaptive Load Balance feature on linux?
> >
> >I know that in windows it works, but in the linux? Anyone has any
> >ideias?
> >
> >Joao Reis.
> >
> >
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PROPOSAL] Network Load Balance
2002-11-26 18:26 ` [PROPOSAL] " Jeff V. Merkey
@ 2002-11-26 22:26 ` Ben Greear
2002-11-27 1:50 ` Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (Listas de discucao)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2002-11-26 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff V. Merkey
Cc: Steven Dake, Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao),
lista do kernel
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Here is something we did at Novell many years back that worked very well for
> load balancing across multiple adapters. This implementation allowed up
> to four (4) adapters to function with load balancing. To pull this off,
> you need to spoof at the MAC laer and alter the MAC addresses in the
> header of received frames to spoof the IP stack above. This method
> requires **NO** changes to any protocol stacks above.
How is this different from the bonding driver(s) that are already
in the kernel?
Also, round-robin type of things seem to cause trouble by re-ordering
packets (as seen by the receiving machine).
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PROPOSAL] Network Load Balance
2002-11-26 22:26 ` Ben Greear
@ 2002-11-27 1:50 ` Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (Listas de discucao)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (Listas de discucao) @ 2002-11-27 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: Jeff V. Merkey, Steven Dake, lista do kernel
I know that in windows you need a capable ethernet adapter (Intel with
adaptive load balance feature) and the intel's load balance driver. Do I
have to have special hardware or driver to make the linux kernel's bonding?
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Ben Greear wrote:
> Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > Here is something we did at Novell many years back that worked very well for
> > load balancing across multiple adapters. This implementation allowed up
> > to four (4) adapters to function with load balancing. To pull this off,
> > you need to spoof at the MAC laer and alter the MAC addresses in the
> > header of received frames to spoof the IP stack above. This method
> > requires **NO** changes to any protocol stacks above.
>
> How is this different from the bonding driver(s) that are already
> in the kernel?
>
> Also, round-robin type of things seem to cause trouble by re-ordering
> packets (as seen by the receiving machine).
>
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
> ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-27 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-25 22:43 Network Load Balance Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (listas de discucao)
2002-11-25 22:59 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-26 18:26 ` [PROPOSAL] " Jeff V. Merkey
2002-11-26 22:26 ` Ben Greear
2002-11-27 1:50 ` Joao Alberto M. dos Reis (Listas de discucao)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-25 22:56 Manish Lachwani
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.