Re: [ACPI] acpi_os_queue_for_execution()

[Andrew Morton <akpm-LL/9OlyS9hIAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

"Grover, Andrew" wrote:
> 
> > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org]
> > Acpi seems to create short-lived kernel threads, and I don't quite
> > understand why.
> >
> > In thermal.c
> >
> >
> >                         tz->timer.data = (unsigned long) tz;
> >                         tz->timer.function = acpi_thermal_run;
> >                         tz->timer.expires = jiffies + (HZ *
> > sleep_time) / 1000;
> >                         add_timer(&(tz->timer));
> >
> > and acpi_thermal_run creates kernel therad that runs
> > acpi_thermal_check. Why is not acpi_thermal_check called directly? I
> > don't like idea of thread being created every time thermal zone needs
> > to be polled...
> 
> Are we allowed to block in a timer callback? One of the things
> thermal_check does is call a control method, which in turn can be very
> slow, sleep, etc., so I'd guess that's why the code tries to execute
> things in its own thread.
> 

acpi_thermal_run is doing many sinful things.  Blocking memory
allocations as well as launching kernel threads from within a
timer handler.

Converting it to use schedule_work() or schedule_delayed_work()
would fix that up.