* masquerading
@ 2003-02-24 8:50 Esteban
2003-02-24 10:21 ` masquerading hare ram
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Esteban @ 2003-02-24 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
hello,
im masquerading my local network like this by now:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MASQUERADE
everything works fine.
but, now i added another internet gw (ppp0) wich is balanced (iproute2)
with eth2.
how do i set the masquerading to balance both gws? (eth2 and ppp0) ?
thanks in advance
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: masquerading
2003-02-24 8:50 masquerading Esteban
@ 2003-02-24 10:21 ` hare ram
2003-02-24 10:33 ` masquerading Esteban Ribicic
2003-02-24 13:50 ` DirecPC on Linux cbaker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hare ram @ 2003-02-24 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Esteban, netfilter
Hi
AFAIK
set another rule with ppp0 instead of eth2
i think it should work
hare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Esteban" <eribicic@sinectis.com>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:20 PM
Subject: masquerading
> hello,
> im masquerading my local network like this by now:
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MASQUERADE
> everything works fine.
> but, now i added another internet gw (ppp0) wich is balanced (iproute2)
> with eth2.
> how do i set the masquerading to balance both gws? (eth2 and ppp0) ?
> thanks in advance
> Steve
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: masquerading
2003-02-24 10:21 ` masquerading hare ram
@ 2003-02-24 10:33 ` Esteban Ribicic
2003-02-24 13:50 ` DirecPC on Linux cbaker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Esteban Ribicic @ 2003-02-24 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hare ram; +Cc: Esteban, netfilter
thanks for the tip..but
ive tryed that, but the second rule does not match..any ther idea?
another:
is any diference on doing -j snat --to--source {internet ip} and give
{internet ip} two values or something like that? instead -j masquerade?
thanks again
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:21, hare ram wrote:
> Hi
>
> AFAIK
>
> set another rule with ppp0 instead of eth2
> i think it should work
>
> hare
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Esteban" <eribicic@sinectis.com>
> To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:20 PM
> Subject: masquerading
>
>
> > hello,
> > im masquerading my local network like this by now:
> > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MASQUERADE
> > everything works fine.
> > but, now i added another internet gw (ppp0) wich is balanced (iproute2)
> > with eth2.
> > how do i set the masquerading to balance both gws? (eth2 and ppp0) ?
> > thanks in advance
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* DirecPC on Linux
2003-02-24 10:21 ` masquerading hare ram
2003-02-24 10:33 ` masquerading Esteban Ribicic
@ 2003-02-24 13:50 ` cbaker
2003-02-24 16:45 ` Glen Spidal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: cbaker @ 2003-02-24 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
I'm just wondering if anyone here has any experience with DirecPC on
Linux. We are unable to get any connection to the Internet at one of
our locations, with the exception of satellite and dial-up. Everyone at
DirecPC claims their satellite modems have to connected to a
Windows machine. I am now getting the impression from some Linux
people that DirecPC on Linux is possible, however.
Chris
========================================
Chris Baker -- technical specialist
614-839-2447x108
cbaker@bbbscentralohio.org
Big Brothers Big Sisters
Association of Central Ohio
www.bbbscentralohio.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: DirecPC on Linux
2003-02-24 13:50 ` DirecPC on Linux cbaker
@ 2003-02-24 16:45 ` Glen Spidal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Glen Spidal @ 2003-02-24 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cbaker, netfilter
I've been in communication with http://www.groundcontrol.com. They offer
several add-on boxes that are OS-independent for Direcway two-way systems.
The option I've been looking at is the 4020 box which connects to the
current satellite modem and is a routher and switch that would allow
connection of a linux server or network.
----- Original Message -----
From: <cbaker@bbbscentralohio.org>
To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:50 AM
Subject: DirecPC on Linux
> I'm just wondering if anyone here has any experience with DirecPC on
> Linux. We are unable to get any connection to the Internet at one of
> our locations, with the exception of satellite and dial-up. Everyone at
> DirecPC claims their satellite modems have to connected to a
> Windows machine. I am now getting the impression from some Linux
> people that DirecPC on Linux is possible, however.
>
> Chris
>
> ========================================
> Chris Baker -- technical specialist
> 614-839-2447x108
> cbaker@bbbscentralohio.org
> Big Brothers Big Sisters
> Association of Central Ohio
> www.bbbscentralohio.org
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-24 16:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-24 8:50 masquerading Esteban
2003-02-24 10:21 ` masquerading hare ram
2003-02-24 10:33 ` masquerading Esteban Ribicic
2003-02-24 13:50 ` DirecPC on Linux cbaker
2003-02-24 16:45 ` Glen Spidal
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.