* [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)]
@ 2003-05-08 11:16 Hans Reiser
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Rudy L. Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2003-05-08 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Lyamin, ReiserFS
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 110 bytes --]
fix this please
and would whatever clever person reported us as spammers please not do
it again?
--
Hans
[-- Attachment #2: we are listed as spammers now! :) --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1155 bytes --]
From: Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
To: reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
Subject: we are listed as spammers now! :)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 12:36:18 +0400
Message-ID: <3EBA1702.1030203@namesys.com>
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">You can check it at
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml
</div>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)]
2003-05-08 11:16 [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)] Hans Reiser
@ 2003-05-08 21:46 ` Rudy L. Zijlstra
2003-05-08 21:56 ` Anders Widman
2003-05-08 22:57 ` Andreas Dilger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rudy L. Zijlstra @ 2003-05-08 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: Alexander Lyamin, ReiserFS
Hans,
it might help if you not only mark spam as such, but also block
them...... There are days that about 50% of spam is by way of reiserfslist.
Cheers,
Rudy
Hans Reiser wrote:
> fix this please
>
> and would whatever clever person reported us as spammers please not do
> it again?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> we are listed as spammers now! :)
> From:
> Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
> Date:
> Thu, 08 May 2003 12:36:18 +0400
> To:
> reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
>
>
> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">You can
> check it at
> http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml
>
>
>
>
>
> </div>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)]
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Rudy L. Zijlstra
@ 2003-05-08 21:56 ` Anders Widman
2003-05-08 22:57 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anders Widman @ 2003-05-08 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
> Hans,
> it might help if you not only mark spam as such, but also block
> them...... There are days that about 50% of spam is by way of reiserfslist.
This has been up many times before ;) It was so much I installed
SpamAssassin myself to remove those from this list (and other
sources)...
//Anders
> Cheers,
> Rudy
> Hans Reiser wrote:
>> fix this please
>>
>> and would whatever clever person reported us as spammers please not do
>> it again?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> we are listed as spammers now! :)
>> From:
>> Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
>> Date:
>> Thu, 08 May 2003 12:36:18 +0400
>> To:
>> reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
>>
>>
>> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">You can
>> check it at
>> http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> </div>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)]
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Rudy L. Zijlstra
2003-05-08 21:56 ` Anders Widman
@ 2003-05-08 22:57 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2003-05-08 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rudy L. Zijlstra; +Cc: Hans Reiser, Alexander Lyamin, ReiserFS
Hans Reiser wrote:
> fix this please
>
> and would whatever clever person reported us as spammers please not do
> it again?
Hans, it is namesys.com that is being listed as the spammers because your
list handling/spamassassin software is removing all previous Received:
headers from list emails. This makes it appear to the outside world
that namesys.com is the origin of this spam. People have commented
several times that they want the original email headers left on so they
can either block spam from known-bad sources, or at least track down
any spammers using the list.
Just FYI, it also turns out that your spamassassin marking the email as
spam (often with very high spam scores) actually reduces the spam score
when it is passed on, because (a) it is coming from somewhere which isn't
supposed to have spam (based on past history) (b) the spamassassin header
often breaks the MIME encoding of the email, so later spamassassins can't
decode the garbage. I actually had to set up a new spam filter which
looks for the [SPAM] in the header in order to catch these coming from
reiserfs-list, when my local spamassassin would have caught them.
Really, your spamassassin should just be configured to dump these into
a mailbox for someone at namesys to look at, and on the extremely unlikely
case that a real message was marked as spam they can forward it to the
list manually.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-08 22:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-08 11:16 [Fwd: we are listed as spammers now! :)] Hans Reiser
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Rudy L. Zijlstra
2003-05-08 21:56 ` Anders Widman
2003-05-08 22:57 ` Andreas Dilger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.