Re: Removal of /proc/asound ?

[James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.demon.co.uk>]

David B Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2003 14:40:30 +1000
> Conrad Parker <conrad@vergenet.net> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:03:01PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>>
>>>I therefore strongly urge you to keep 2.4 functionality as it was and feel
>>>free to do whatever is needed for the 2.5/2.6 kernel.
>>
>>erik, you're hassling the wrong people -- a script exists to make the
>>devices you want, this is a packaging problem for el Debian ALSA Psychos
>>(knowing that erik uses debian), and a bog-standard GOTCHA for CVS users,
>>unless it can be done by make install or something.
> 
> 
> One of the Debian ALSA maintainers here.
> 
> The removal of /proc/asound/dev/ has been noted, and shouldn't be a
> problem :) Once we actually upload packages within which
> /proc/asound/dev/ has been removed, anyways. We haven't yet. I doubt
> erik is bitching because of this, he hasn't asked any of us about it.

I am running Debian with kernel.org kernel 2.4.20 and devfs.
Why does anyone have to wait until kernel 2.5 for devfs.

Cheers
James




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge