From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
Georg Nikodym <georgn@somanetworks.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthias Mueller <matthias.mueller@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io stalls
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:51:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE7EAB2.5010705@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE7EA4A.5030105@cyberone.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:41:58PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Chris Mason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 21:29, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> this will avoid get_request_wait_wakeup to mess the wakeup, so we can
>>>>> wakep_nr(rq.count) safely.
>>>>>
>>>>> then there's the last issue raised by Chris, that is if we get
>>>>> request
>>>>> released faster than the tasks can run, still we can generate a not
>>>>> perfect fairness. My solution to that is to change wake_up to have a
>>>>> nr_exclusive not obeying to the try_to_wakeup retval. that should
>>>>> guarantee exact FIFO then, but it's a minor issue because the
>>>>> requests
>>>>> shouldn't be released systematically in a flood. So I'm leaving it
>>>>> opened for now, the others already addressed should be the major
>>>>> ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I think the only time we really need to wakeup more than one waiter is
>>>> when we hit the q->batch_request mark. After that, each new request
>>>> that is freed can be matched with a single waiter, and we know that
>>>> any
>>>> previously finished requests have probably already been matched to
>>>> their
>>>> own waiter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Nope. Not even then. Each retiring request should submit
>>> a wake up, and the process will submit another request.
>>> So the number of requests will be held at the batch_request
>>> mark until no more waiters.
>>>
>>> Now that begs the question, why have batch_requests anymore?
>>> It no longer does anything.
>>>
>>
>> it does nothing w/ _exclusive and w/o the wake_up_nr, that's why I added
>> the wake_up_nr.
>>
>>
> That is pretty pointless as well. You might as well just start
> waking up at the queue full limit, and wake one at a time.
>
> The purpose for batch_requests was I think for devices with a
> very small request size, to reduce context switches.
I guess you could fix this by having a "last woken" flag, and
allow that process to allocate requests without blocking from
the batch limit until the queue full limit. That is how
batch_requests is supposed to work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-29 0:55 Linux 2.4.21-rc6 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-29 1:22 ` Con Kolivas
2003-05-29 5:24 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 5:34 ` Riley Williams
2003-05-29 5:57 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 7:15 ` Riley Williams
2003-05-29 8:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-29 8:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-06-03 16:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-06-03 16:13 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-04 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-06-05 2:10 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-03 16:30 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-03 16:53 ` Matthias Mueller
2003-06-03 16:59 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 17:03 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 18:02 ` Anders Karlsson
2003-06-03 21:12 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-06-03 21:18 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 17:23 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-04 14:56 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-06-04 4:04 ` Marc Wilson
2003-05-29 10:02 ` Con Kolivas
2003-05-29 18:00 ` Georg Nikodym
2003-05-29 19:11 ` -rc7 " Marcelo Tosatti
2003-05-29 19:56 ` Krzysiek Taraszka
2003-05-29 20:18 ` Krzysiek Taraszka
2003-06-04 18:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-06-04 21:41 ` Krzysiek Taraszka
2003-06-04 22:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-04 10:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-04 10:35 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-04 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
2003-06-04 10:46 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-04 10:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-04 11:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-04 12:00 ` Jens Axboe
2003-06-04 12:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-04 12:20 ` Jens Axboe
2003-06-04 20:50 ` Rob Landley
2003-06-04 12:11 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-04 12:35 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-06-09 21:39 ` [PATCH] io stalls (was: -rc7 Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6) Chris Mason
2003-06-09 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-10 0:27 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-10 23:13 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-11 0:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 0:44 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-09 23:51 ` [PATCH] io stalls Nick Piggin
2003-06-10 0:32 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-10 0:47 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-10 1:48 ` Robert White
2003-06-10 2:13 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-10 23:04 ` Robert White
2003-06-11 0:58 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-10 3:22 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-10 21:17 ` Robert White
2003-06-11 0:40 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-11 0:33 ` [PATCH] io stalls (was: -rc7 Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6) Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 0:48 ` [PATCH] io stalls Nick Piggin
2003-06-11 1:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 0:54 ` [PATCH] io stalls (was: -rc7 Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6) Chris Mason
2003-06-11 1:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 1:57 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-11 2:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 12:24 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-11 17:42 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-11 18:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-11 18:27 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-11 18:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 1:04 ` [PATCH] io stalls Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 1:12 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-12 1:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 1:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 2:22 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-12 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 2:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 2:49 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 2:51 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-06-12 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 3:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 2:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 3:04 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 3:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 3:20 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 3:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 3:48 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 4:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-12 4:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-12 16:06 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-12 16:16 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-25 19:03 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-25 19:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-25 20:18 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-27 8:41 ` write-caches, I/O stalls: MUST-FIX (was: [PATCH] io stalls) Matthias Andree
2003-06-26 5:48 ` [PATCH] io stalls Nick Piggin
2003-06-26 11:48 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-26 13:04 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-26 13:18 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-26 15:55 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-27 1:21 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-27 1:39 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-27 9:45 ` Nick Piggin
2003-06-27 12:41 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-12 11:57 ` Chris Mason
2003-06-04 10:43 ` -rc7 Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6 Andrea Arcangeli
2003-06-04 11:01 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-03 19:45 ` Config issue (CONFIG_X86_TSC) " Paul
2003-06-03 20:18 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EE7EAB2.5010705@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=georgn@somanetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=matthias.mueller@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.