* i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask?
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Kris Jones
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kris Jones @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
I've been trying to get lm_sensors to work for several days now, but I'm
having the hardest time getting i2c to compile.
I looked for a support forum mailing list or web-address, but this was about
the only one I found. Is this the right place to ask some questions about
compiling i2c?
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/junkmail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask?
2005-05-19 6:24 i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask? Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Kris Jones
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark D. Studebaker @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Kris Jones wrote:
> I've been trying to get lm_sensors to work for several days now, but I'm
> having the hardest time getting i2c to compile.
>
> I looked for a support forum mailing list or web-address, but this was
> about the only one I found. Is this the right place to ask some
> questions about compiling i2c?
>
yes. what's the problem?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask?
2005-05-19 6:24 i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask? Kris Jones
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kris Jones @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
First off, I am a novice at kernel-related stuff, I've only compiled one a
few times, and that was with lots of help, and I've never done anything with
modules.
So I was attempting this compile on a RH 8.0 box, but I ran up2date and
updated the kernel, so I don't think the source matches. I think that
might've been the cause of the problems on that one.
So I switched to a different box running RH 7.3, and I'm still getting
errors, but they seem to be a bit more rational. I believe it has something
to do with where the headers are installed, but I'm at a loss...
I'm running kernel 2.4.18-10 on it, and I downloaded the source from
ftp.kernel.org, gunzipped it and untarred it in /usr/src, so all the source
is located in /usr/src/linux.
I don't know what I should be doing to the kernel source from there, or if I
should be doing anything at all. I did a "make clean" there, but that's all.
So I go to the i2c source dir and do a "make clean" and then a "make
install" and I get this:
gcc -I/lib/modules/2.4.18-10/build/include -O2 -DLM_SENSORS -D__KERNEL__
-DMODULE -fomit-frame-pointer -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c kernel/i2c-core.c -o
kernel/i2c-core.o
In file included from /usr/include/linux/module.h:20, from
kernel/i2c-core.c:26:
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use
kernel-headers system headers,
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but rather headers from an
appropriate kernel-source package.
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:3:2: #error Change -I/usr/src/linux/include
(or similar) to
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:4:2: #error -I/lib/modules/$(uname
-r)/build/include
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:5:2: #error to build against the
currently-running kernel.
kernel/i2c-core.c:43:25: asm/uaccess.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [kernel/i2c-core.o] Error 1
I looked at the paths in the Makefile, but they seem ok set to default.
Also, how do I know if i2c support is compiled into my kernel?
Thanks!
>From: "Mark D. Studebaker " <mds@paradyne.com>
>Reply-To: LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>
>To: Kris Jones <shiny_razor@hotmail.com>
>CC: LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>
>Subject: Re: i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask?
>Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:31:05 -0400
>
>
>
>Kris Jones wrote:
>>I've been trying to get lm_sensors to work for several days now, but I'm
>>having the hardest time getting i2c to compile.
>>
>>I looked for a support forum mailing list or web-address, but this was
>>about the only one I found. Is this the right place to ask some questions
>>about compiling i2c?
>>
>
>
>yes. what's the problem?
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/virus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask?
2005-05-19 6:24 i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask? Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> First off, I am a novice at kernel-related stuff, I've only compiled
> one a few times, and that was with lots of help, and I've never done
> anything with modules.
In this case, trying to install i2c and lm_sensors2 from sources is
*not* what you want to do. Look for packages from Red Hat instead. I
don't know if they are directly on the distribution disks or if you need
to use up2date or another tool to grab them. I think that "up2date
lm_sensors" should download and install everything needed, however.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-19 6:24 i2c-2.7.0 compile errors... right place to ask? Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Kris Jones
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.