All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS
@ 2003-06-23  0:48 more
  2003-06-23  1:01 ` more
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: more @ 2003-06-23  0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

Hi,

I am using XFS on LVM1 now.

I build snapshot LV using xfs_freeze and not using norecovery mount 
option. This is commended in lvm-howto.
But in my test, if I reboot the system in the progress of file writing 
on a LV that has snapshot,  the next time mounting snapshot will report 
XFS error and the system wants to repair the snapshot. So I will have to 
use norecovery option now.

I feel puzzled that why XFS repairing is needed on snapshot, I am now 
building an enterprise network file server, the robust is very important 
for us.

Very thanks for any feeding, by the way, it is not possible for me to 
use LVM2 in current.


Regards,
more

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS
  2003-06-23  0:48 [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS more
@ 2003-06-23  1:01 ` more
  2003-06-23  3:44 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  2003-06-24  3:59 ` more
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: more @ 2003-06-23  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

Hi,

By the way, I am using 2.4.19 kernel and 1.2 XFS and 1.0.3 LVM1.

more wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using XFS on LVM1 now.
>
> I build snapshot LV using xfs_freeze and not using norecovery mount 
> option. This is commended in lvm-howto.
> But in my test, if I reboot the system in the progress of file writing 
> on a LV that has snapshot,  the next time mounting snapshot will 
> report XFS error and the system wants to repair the snapshot. So I 
> will have to use norecovery option now.
>
> I feel puzzled that why XFS repairing is needed on snapshot, I am now 
> building an enterprise network file server, the robust is very 
> important for us.
>
> Very thanks for any feeding, by the way, it is not possible for me to 
> use LVM2 in current.
>
>
> Regards,
> more
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS
  2003-06-23  0:48 [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS more
  2003-06-23  1:01 ` more
@ 2003-06-23  3:44 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  2003-06-24  3:59 ` more
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2003-06-23  3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

The snapshot stores any exceptions on the original LV
(IOW: changed chunks of 32KB default size) synchronously in LVM1.

In your testcase this obviously keeps an XFS dirty status on the snapshot
during file writes at reboot.

XFS experts are the guys to ask how that happens
(and can be avoided).

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:47:37PM +0800, more wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am using XFS on LVM1 now.
> 
> I build snapshot LV using xfs_freeze and not using norecovery mount 
> option. This is commended in lvm-howto.
> But in my test, if I reboot the system in the progress of file writing 
> on a LV that has snapshot,  the next time mounting snapshot will report 
> XFS error and the system wants to repair the snapshot. So I will have to 
> use norecovery option now.
> 
> I feel puzzled that why XFS repairing is needed on snapshot, I am now 
> building an enterprise network file server, the robust is very important 
> for us.
> 
> Very thanks for any feeding, by the way, it is not possible for me to 
> use LVM2 in current.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> more
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

-- 

Regards,
Heinz    -- The LVM Guy --

*** Software bugs are stupid.
    Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer                       Am Sonnenhang 11
                                                  56242 Marienrachdorf
                                                  Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 2626 141200
                                                       FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS
  2003-06-23  0:48 [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS more
  2003-06-23  1:01 ` more
  2003-06-23  3:44 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
@ 2003-06-24  3:59 ` more
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: more @ 2003-06-24  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

Hi,  friends,

I forgot to send the information for the system configuration:
LVM1.0.3 and XFS1.2 and 2.4.19 kernel.

Thanks for your feeding.


Regards,
more


more wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using XFS on LVM1 now.
>
> I build snapshot LV using xfs_freeze and not using norecovery mount 
> option. This is commended in lvm-howto.
> But in my test, if I reboot the system in the progress of file writing 
> on a LV that has snapshot,  the next time mounting snapshot will 
> report XFS error and the system wants to repair the snapshot. So I 
> will have to use norecovery option now.
>
> I feel puzzled that why XFS repairing is needed on snapshot, I am now 
> building an enterprise network file server, the robust is very 
> important for us.
>
> Very thanks for any feeding, by the way, it is not possible for me to 
> use LVM2 in current.
>
>
> Regards,
> more
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-24  3:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-23  0:48 [linux-lvm] problem of snapshot on XFS more
2003-06-23  1:01 ` more
2003-06-23  3:44 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2003-06-24  3:59 ` more

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.