lm_sensors2/kernel/include sensors.h

lm_sensors2/kernel/include sensors.h

[Mark D. Studebaker]

Don't do this!
sensors.h is now automatically generated...
(see sensors.h.template and Module.mk).
We're going to remove sensors.h from CVS before the release.
If there's a warning to be fixed it's in sensors.h.template??

author@mordac.netroedge.com wrote:
> Update of /home/cvs/lm_sensors2/kernel/include
> In directory mordac.netroedge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26137
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	sensors.h 
> Log Message:
> (Khali) Trivial warning removal.
> 

lm_sensors2/kernel/include sensors.h

[Jean Delvare]

> Don't do this!
> sensors.h is now automatically generated...
> (see sensors.h.template and Module.mk).
> We're going to remove sensors.h from CVS before the release.
> If there's a warning to be fixed it's in sensors.h.template??

Isn't removing sensors.h right before the release a bit dangerous? The
autogeneration feature should be tested before that.

As for the warning I removed, it's in a comment that does not exist in
sensors.h.template, so there's nothing to care about.

-- 
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/

lm_sensors2/kernel/include sensors.h

[Mark D. Studebaker]

It may be dangeroous (but I don't think so) but it's already happened. 
sensors.h is overwritten by the automatically-generated version.
Looks to me like it works great.
Keep testing...

Jean Delvare wrote:
>>Don't do this!
>>sensors.h is now automatically generated...
>>(see sensors.h.template and Module.mk).
>>We're going to remove sensors.h from CVS before the release.
>>If there's a warning to be fixed it's in sensors.h.template??
> 
> 
> Isn't removing sensors.h right before the release a bit dangerous? The
> autogeneration feature should be tested before that.
> 
> As for the warning I removed, it's in a comment that does not exist in
> sensors.h.template, so there's nothing to care about.
>