From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: RFC on io-stalls patch
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:45:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F118CC6.9080906@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1058113238.13313.127.camel@tiny.suse.com>
Chris Mason wrote:
> Well, I'd say it's a more common problem to have lots of writes, but it
> is pretty easy to fill the queue with reads.
Well....
* you will usually have more reads than writes
* reads are more dependent than writes, on the whole
* writes are larger due to delays and merging
All this is obviously workload dependent, but it seems like the 60%
common case, at least...
Basically when I hear people talking about lots of writes, that seems to
be downplaying the fact that seeing 20 writes and 2 reads on a queue
does not take into account the userspace applications currently
blocking, waiting to do another read.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-13 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-08 20:06 RFC on io-stalls patch Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-10 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-11 14:13 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-12 0:20 ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-12 18:37 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-12 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-12 7:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-12 18:32 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-13 0:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-13 9:01 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-13 16:20 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-13 16:45 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-07-13 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-13 17:47 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-13 19:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 0:36 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-13 19:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 5:49 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-14 12:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-14 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-14 19:51 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-14 20:09 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-14 20:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 21:24 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 5:46 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-14 20:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-14 20:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 20:34 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 5:35 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20030714224528.GU16313@dualathlon.random>
2003-07-15 5:40 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1058229360.13317.364.camel@tiny.suse.com>
2003-07-15 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20030714175238.3eaddd9a.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20030715020706.GC16313@dualathlon.random>
2003-07-15 5:45 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 6:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 6:08 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 7:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 8:28 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 9:12 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 9:30 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 10:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 10:11 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 14:18 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 14:29 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 17:06 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 9:22 ` Chris Mason
2003-07-15 9:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 9:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 20:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-14 20:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-14 20:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 5:26 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 5:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 6:01 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-15 6:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-15 11:22 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-15 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 12:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-16 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 12:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-16 13:04 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 13:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-16 13:21 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 13:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-16 14:00 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-16 14:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-16 16:49 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-15 18:47 Shane Shrybman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F118CC6.9080906@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.