* AX25/NETROM
@ 2003-05-12 19:03 Ron
2003-05-13 0:39 ` AX25/NETROM Bob Nielsen
2003-05-13 11:36 ` AX25/NETROM Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ron @ 2003-05-12 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-Hams
I am trying to setup DXSPIDER as a DX Cluster and am experiencing some
trouble trying to get the AX25 stuff going.
I have compiled kernel V.2.4.2-2 with the following enabled:
networking support (General support)
UNIX domain sockets (Networking options)
AX.25 Level 2 protocol
serial port KISS driver
Amateur Radio NET/ROM protocol
From the AX.25HOW-TO
I have downloaded and installed the AX.25 library, tools and application
programs with no apparent error messages????
I have edited AX25d.conf, axports, nrports, nrbroadcast and their relevant
sections are shown below.
From the DXSPIDER install manual, executing the following commands gets this:
kissattach /dev/ttyS0 spider 192.168.0.0
LINUX ---> AX.25 port spider bound to device ax0
kissattach /dev/ttyS1 spideruse 192.168.0.0
LINUX ---> AX.25 port spideruse bound to device ax1
kissparms -p spider -t 150 -l 150 -s 50 -r 50
kissparms -p spideruse -t 150 -l 150 -s 50 -r 50
nrattach netrom
LINUX ---> NET/ROM port netrom bound to device nr0
nrattach netrom2
LINUX ---> NET/ROM port netrom bound to device nr1
------------so far looks good???????-------
ax25d
LINUX --->nrconfig:port netrom not active
LINUX --->nrconfig:port netrom2 not active
LINUX --->rsconfig: port rose not active
LINUX --->invalid NET/ROM port 'netrom2'
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 64
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 65
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 66
LINUX --->invalid NET/ROM port 'netrom'
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 70
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 71
LINUX --->bad config entry on line 72
---------NOT GOOD???????, and i do not know why???????--------------
AX25D.CONF:#
# AX.25 Ports begin with a '['.
#
[ke7rt-0 via spider]
parameters 2 1 6 900 * 15 0
NOCALL * * * * * * L
default * * * * * * - sysop /spider/src/client client %u ax25
#[ke7rt-0 via spideruse]
parameters 2 1 6 900 * 15 0
NOCALL * * * * * * L
default * * * * * * - sysop /spider/src/client client %u ax25
#
#
# NET/ROM Ports begin with a '<'.
#
<netrom2>
parameters 1 10 * * * 3 *
NOCALL * * * * * * L
default * * * * * * - sysop /spider/src/client client %u ax25
#
#
<netrom>
parameters 1 10 * * * 3 *
NOCALL * * * * * * L
default * * * * * * 0 root /usr/sbin/node node
#
AXPORTS:
#
#
spider KE7RT-1 9600 255 7 BACKBONE
spideruse KE7RT-2 9600 255 7 USERS
NRPORTS
#
# The format of this file is:
# name callsign alias paclen description
#
#netrom OH2BNS-10 #LNODE 235 Switch Port
#
#
# THIS IS FOR KE7RT DX CLUSTER
#
#
netrom KE7RT-3 BCKBN 235 BACKBONE 145.53 MHZ
netrom2 KE7RT-4 LOCAL 235 USER 145.07 MHZ
NRBROADCAST:
# /etc/ax25/nrbroadcast
#
# The format of this file is:
#
# ax25_name min_obs def_qual worst_qual verbose
#
#1 5 192 100 0
#2 5 255 100 1
#
#
# THIS IS FOR KE7RT DX CLUSTER
#
#
spider 5 10 100 0
spideruse 5 10 100 1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AX25/NETROM
2003-05-12 19:03 AX25/NETROM Ron
@ 2003-05-13 0:39 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-05-13 11:36 ` AX25/NETROM Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bob Nielsen @ 2003-05-13 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-Hams
Ron,
Several of the early 2.4 kernel versions apparently have problems with
AX.25. I suggest you try 2.4.19 or 2.4.20 (will 2.4.21 ever get
released?)
In your ax25d.conf, you have a line:
#[ke7rt-0 via spideruse]
This line should not have a #.
73,
Bob, N7XY
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: AX25/NETROM
2003-05-12 19:03 AX25/NETROM Ron
2003-05-13 0:39 ` AX25/NETROM Bob Nielsen
@ 2003-05-13 11:36 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS @ 2003-05-13 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ron; +Cc: Linux-Hams
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Ron wrote:
> kissattach /dev/ttyS0 spider 192.168.0.0
> kissattach /dev/ttyS1 spideruse 192.168.0.0
> kissparms -p spider -t 150 -l 150 -s 50 -r 50
> kissparms -p spideruse -t 150 -l 150 -s 50 -r 50
> nrattach netrom
> nrattach netrom2
> LINUX --->nrconfig:port netrom not active
> LINUX --->nrconfig:port netrom2 not active
> LINUX --->rsconfig: port rose not active
I think you need to give the netrom interfaces an IP number too. Try the
"-i" option to nrattach. And by the way it might be better to not use
192.168.0.0 as the IP number as it's a network address. Use .1 instead.
The ROSE warning you can probably ignore or better, edit "rsports" and
comment the default config out.
--
Tomi Manninen Internet: oh2bns@sral.fi
OH2BNS AX.25: oh2bns@oh2rbi.fin.eu
KP20ME04 Amprnet: oh2bns@oh2rbi.ampr.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ax25/netrom
@ 2003-08-05 14:38 Kjell Jarl
2003-10-11 14:51 ` ax25/netrom Kjell Jarl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kjell Jarl @ 2003-08-05 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Hams
I installed 2.4.21, 9a4gl patch, it just got hanged again.
I will go back to 2.2.25 and see now.
The last thing that happened, was a remote user, probably not in the
routing table, connected over netrom, then disconnected. That was the
last thing seen.
Lack of routing/alias?
73
Kjell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ax25/netrom
2003-08-05 14:38 ax25/netrom Kjell Jarl
@ 2003-10-11 14:51 ` Kjell Jarl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kjell Jarl @ 2003-10-11 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Hams
Hi!
This is an update to the long story of ax25 netrom problems here.
It _seems_ the problems are solved. Thanks to 9a4gl patch, and others
sugesting going back to kernel 2.2.
I installed the following kernels:
sk7hw runs 2.2.25 since august 4 (only radio ports)
sm7gvf runs 2.4.21 9a4gl patch 20030831 since september 14 (radioport
and internet firewalling)
No more panics observed since these changes, I will post as soon as I
see one.
73
Kjell, sm7gvf
Kjell Jarl wrote:
> I installed 2.4.21, 9a4gl patch, it just got hanged again.
>
> I will go back to 2.2.25 and see now.
>
> The last thing that happened, was a remote user, probably not in the
> routing table, connected over netrom, then disconnected. That was the
> last thing seen.
>
> Lack of routing/alias?
>
> 73
> Kjell
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-11 14:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-05 14:38 ax25/netrom Kjell Jarl
2003-10-11 14:51 ` ax25/netrom Kjell Jarl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-12 19:03 AX25/NETROM Ron
2003-05-13 0:39 ` AX25/NETROM Bob Nielsen
2003-05-13 11:36 ` AX25/NETROM Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.