* Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
@ 2003-08-08 13:08 Mark Watts
2003-08-08 13:21 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Watts @ 2003-08-08 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image chip
- - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
Cheers,
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/M6DABn4EFUVUIO0RApDvAJoDz1ExF/zNuzsydq8/q/pB8ZaCvwCg58pW
Rq7zYfp+o7KKEnVIUw/IDmI=
=kCCB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
2003-08-08 13:08 Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards Mark Watts
@ 2003-08-08 13:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 14:11 ` Mark Watts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-08-08 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Watts; +Cc: linux-kernel
Mark Watts wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
>
> http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
>
>
> The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image chip
> - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
2003-08-08 13:21 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-08-08 14:11 ` Mark Watts
2003-08-08 14:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 17:20 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mark Watts @ 2003-08-08 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Mark Watts wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
> >
> > http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
> >
> >
> > The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
> > chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
>
> If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for
the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
# hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
# echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings
Cheers,
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/M6+QBn4EFUVUIO0RAsTlAJ47iXTKk7/VUEk/V5AdLe/5FcJODwCg+9MK
lli1yAzptbJho+gqpF/zxHc=
=DSWc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
2003-08-08 14:11 ` Mark Watts
@ 2003-08-08 14:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 15:16 ` Justin Cormack
2003-08-08 17:20 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-08-08 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Watts; +Cc: linux-kernel
Mark Watts wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>>Mark Watts wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
>>>
>>>http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
>>>
>>>
>>>The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
>>>chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
>>
>>If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
>
>
> Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for
> the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
>
> # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings
I have no idea :( I'm off in libata land, which will soon support
Silicon Image SATA as well...
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
2003-08-08 14:29 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-08-08 15:16 ` Justin Cormack
2003-08-08 17:21 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-11 7:51 ` Mark Watts
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Justin Cormack @ 2003-08-08 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Mark Watts, Kernel mailing list
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 15:29, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mark Watts wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> >>Mark Watts wrote:
> >>
> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>My local supplier has started doing some SATA cards....
> >>>
> >>>http://www.ivmm.com/eio/products_sata_pci_host.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>The chip on the board i the screenshot looks vaguely like a Silicon Image
> >>>chip - - am I correct in thinking that these are supported in linux?
> >>
> >>If they are Silicon Image, yes, they are supported.
> >
> >
> > Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for
> > the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
> >
> > # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> > # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings
>
>
> I have no idea :( I'm off in libata land, which will soon support
> Silicon Image SATA as well...
the answer is yes - there hasnt been an update to the driver. Andre
Hedrick says he has fixed it a month or so ago but has not released it
yet.
btw echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings is not for
good performance (it may halve your performance on some drives) it is a
bug workaround.
Look forward to testing libata on Silicon Image.
Justin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards...
2003-08-08 14:11 ` Mark Watts
2003-08-08 14:29 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-08-08 17:20 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-08-08 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Watts; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Gwe, 2003-08-08 at 15:11, Mark Watts wrote:
> Great stuff - can someone confirm whether I still need to do the folloing for
> the latest 2.4.22 kernels in order to get good performance?
>
> # hdparm -d1 -X66 /dev/hdX
> # echo "max_kb_per_request:15" > /proc/.ide/hdX/settings
In -ac pretty much everything "just works". Just finishing off one or
two last issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-11 12:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-08 13:08 Innovision EIO DM-8301H/R SATA cards Mark Watts
2003-08-08 13:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 14:11 ` Mark Watts
2003-08-08 14:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 15:16 ` Justin Cormack
2003-08-08 17:21 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-11 7:51 ` Mark Watts
2003-08-11 8:57 ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-11 12:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-08 17:20 ` Alan Cox
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.