* Re: how to clear the conntrack table!
2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
@ 2003-06-27 9:28 ` Flavio Pescuma
2003-08-25 10:14 ` Eicke Friedrich
2003-08-25 11:11 ` Where is conntrack in the iptables chain? Scott MacKay
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Flavio Pescuma @ 2003-06-27 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harald Welte; +Cc: Decoy, netfilter-devel
You could look into using the patch I send some day ago. the you could
set all connection to unconfirmed, and then set you rule set so that al
unconfirmed packets pass the rule set
/flavio
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 23:08, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 05:13:05PM +0800, Decoy wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > how can I clear the conntrack table?!
>
> unfortunately there is currently no other way than to unload and reload the
> ip_conntrack module :(
>
> > Thanks very much!
> > dec0y
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* how to clear the conntrack table!
@ 2003-08-15 9:13 Decoy
2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Decoy @ 2003-08-15 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi!
how can I clear the conntrack table?!
Thanks very much!
dec0y
forlegend@163.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: how to clear the conntrack table!
2003-08-15 9:13 how to clear the conntrack table! Decoy
@ 2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
2003-06-27 9:28 ` Flavio Pescuma
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Harald Welte @ 2003-08-23 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Decoy; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 05:13:05PM +0800, Decoy wrote:
> Hi!
>
> how can I clear the conntrack table?!
unfortunately there is currently no other way than to unload and reload the
ip_conntrack module :(
> Thanks very much!
> dec0y
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: how to clear the conntrack table!
2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
2003-06-27 9:28 ` Flavio Pescuma
@ 2003-08-25 10:14 ` Eicke Friedrich
2003-08-25 10:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-08-25 11:11 ` Where is conntrack in the iptables chain? Scott MacKay
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eicke Friedrich @ 2003-08-25 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Harald Welte wrote:
> unfortunately there is currently no other way than to unload and
> reload the ip_conntrack module :(
I've tried this a couple of times. The module seems to get deleted
(lsmod still shows ip_conntrack but as deleted) but rmmod does NOT
finish. It grabs 100% CPU for minutes. I had to reboot the box then.
Any hints?
Regards,
Eicke.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: how to clear the conntrack table!
2003-08-25 10:14 ` Eicke Friedrich
@ 2003-08-25 10:31 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2003-08-25 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eicke Friedrich; +Cc: netfilter-devel
In case your running an older kernel (before -pre9), try the latest -rc
kernel or submitted/70_ip-conntrack-expect-drop-refcnt-combined.patch
from patch-o-matic.
Bye,
Patrick
Eicke Friedrich wrote:
>
> Harald Welte wrote:
>
>> unfortunately there is currently no other way than to unload and
>> reload the ip_conntrack module :(
>
> I've tried this a couple of times. The module seems to get deleted
> (lsmod still shows ip_conntrack but as deleted) but rmmod does NOT
> finish. It grabs 100% CPU for minutes. I had to reboot the box then.
> Any hints?
>
> Regards,
> Eicke.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Where is conntrack in the iptables chain?
2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
2003-06-27 9:28 ` Flavio Pescuma
2003-08-25 10:14 ` Eicke Friedrich
@ 2003-08-25 11:11 ` Scott MacKay
2003-08-25 11:22 ` Patrick Schaaf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Scott MacKay @ 2003-08-25 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
I was wondering, where in the iptables chain does
conntrack start? In the segment of the chain, does it
ack before or after inserted rules (like QUEUE)?
Thanks in advance!
-Scott
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is conntrack in the iptables chain?
2003-08-25 11:11 ` Where is conntrack in the iptables chain? Scott MacKay
@ 2003-08-25 11:22 ` Patrick Schaaf
2003-08-25 11:29 ` Scott MacKay
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Schaaf @ 2003-08-25 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott MacKay; +Cc: netfilter-devel
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:11:12AM -0700, Scott MacKay wrote:
> I was wondering, where in the iptables chain does
> conntrack start? In the segment of the chain, does it
> ack before or after inserted rules (like QUEUE)?
What do you mean with 'does it ack'? conntracking is not supposed
to pass verdicts on a packet, it's just looking up tracking information
for a passing packet.
That connection lookup happens before all other hooks, i.e. before a
packet enters iptables in the mangle table PREROUTING chain. Thus,
even rules in the prerouting chain can already use the tracking
information.
Does that answer your question?
best regards
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is conntrack in the iptables chain?
2003-08-25 11:22 ` Patrick Schaaf
@ 2003-08-25 11:29 ` Scott MacKay
2003-08-25 11:43 ` Patrick Schaaf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Scott MacKay @ 2003-08-25 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Schaaf; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Lol, ack = act. Only 1 cup of coffee this morning...
--- Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de> wrote:
<snip>
> That connection lookup happens before all other
> hooks, i.e. before a
> packet enters iptables in the mangle table
> PREROUTING chain. Thus,
> even rules in the prerouting chain can already use
> the tracking
> information.
>
> Does that answer your question?
Yup. Are there any examples of how to manipulate
packets prior to conntrack, either as a loadable
module or via iptables? I seem to recall a patch
which added raw tables that acted before anything else
but do not recall which rev of iptables it acted on...
-Scott
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is conntrack in the iptables chain?
2003-08-25 11:29 ` Scott MacKay
@ 2003-08-25 11:43 ` Patrick Schaaf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Schaaf @ 2003-08-25 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott MacKay; +Cc: netfilter-devel
> Yup. Are there any examples of how to manipulate
> packets prior to conntrack, either as a loadable
> module or via iptables? I seem to recall a patch
> which added raw tables that acted before anything else
> but do not recall which rev of iptables it acted on...
Hi again,
you want to look at the general netfilter hooks, and how their
priorities work. You can look at the iptables kernel source
for inspiration, it's rather simple. In net/ipv4/netfilter,
grep for nf_register_hook, and look at the argument to
that function, usually a locally defined constant struct.
The conntrack hooking is in ip_conntrack_standalone.c.
Notice the NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK in the struct definition:
this is defined in include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h, and
represents a numerical priority value; for each
hook that the core network stack runs, the hook
functions for all registered modules, are called
in numerically ascending priority order. Specifically,
NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK is the lowest, numerically -200,
so for your own hook, you'll need something even below
that value, e.g. -201.
all the best
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: how to clear the conntrack table!
@ 2003-10-16 7:57 Eicke Friedrich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eicke Friedrich @ 2003-10-16 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi again,
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Eicke Friedrich wrote:
>
>> Harald Welte wrote:
>>
>>> unfortunately there is currently no other way than to unload
>>> and reload the ip_conntrack module
>>
>>
>>
>> I've tried this a couple of times. The module seems to get
>> deleted (lsmod still shows ip_conntrack but as deleted) but rmmod
>> does NOT finish. It grabs 100% CPU for minutes. I had to reboot
>> the box then. Any hints?
>
> In case your running an older kernel (before -pre9), try the latest
> -rc kernel or
submitted/70_ip-conntrack-expect-drop-refcnt-combined.patch from
> patch-o-matic.
Not having time before I updated my box today to kernel version 2.4.22
from kernel.org. The system works still very well but I'm still not
able to unload the conntrack module. It's the same problem as I
described above using 2.4.21. So anyone there who knows an answer?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Eicke Friedrich
PS: Sorry Patrick for sending this message directly to you - I forgot
to change the receiver. :-(
My system:
Dual Athlon MP, 512 MB RAM
Following patches applied:
Enable NF on a bridge: ebtables-brnf-2_vs_2.4.22.diff
NETFILTER P-O-M:
Already applied: submitted/01_2.4.19
submitted/02_2.4.20
submitted/03_2.4.21
submitted/04_2.4.22
submitted/44_backport_ah_esp_fixes
submitted/45_masq_routing_check
submitted/54_ip_nat-macro-args
submitted/58-ip_conntrack-macro-args
submitted/60_nat_tftp-remove-warning
submitted/73_ipt_MASQUERADE-oif
submitted/74_nat-range-fix
submitted/75_REJECT_localpmtu-fix
submitted/76_snmp-checksum_h-fix
submitted/77_destroy-conntrack
submitted/78_nathelper-udp-csum
submitted/79_mangle_udp-sizecheck
submitted/80_ip_conntrack-proc
submitted/81_ipt_unclean-tcp-flag-table
submitted/83_nolocalout
submitted/84_local-nullbinding
submitted/86_getorigdst-tuple-zero
submitted/87_nat-helpers-u16
pending/59_ip_nat_h-unused-var
pending/61-remove-memsets
pending/64_masquerade-sameip-noflush
pending/69_amanda-helpers
pending/70_expect-evict-order
pending/72_recent_procfs_fix
base/connlimit
base/mport
base/quota
extra/CLASSIFY
extra/CONNMARK
extra/string
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-16 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-15 9:13 how to clear the conntrack table! Decoy
2003-08-23 21:08 ` Harald Welte
2003-06-27 9:28 ` Flavio Pescuma
2003-08-25 10:14 ` Eicke Friedrich
2003-08-25 10:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-08-25 11:11 ` Where is conntrack in the iptables chain? Scott MacKay
2003-08-25 11:22 ` Patrick Schaaf
2003-08-25 11:29 ` Scott MacKay
2003-08-25 11:43 ` Patrick Schaaf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-16 7:57 how to clear the conntrack table! Eicke Friedrich
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.