* root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22
@ 2003-08-29 23:09 Michael Pruznick
2003-08-29 23:21 ` Samuel Flory
2003-08-29 23:28 ` Herbert Poetzl
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Pruznick @ 2003-08-29 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Was root=nfs removed on purpose or is it an unexpected
side effect of the "ROOT NFS fixes" patch from late
July 2003?
I understand this patch from the point of wanting to
eliminate nfs attempts when nfs is not requested. That
is clearly a reasonable thing to do. However, "root=nfs"
is a nfs request that has been accepted in the past, I've
been told, because nfs isn't a real device (but maybe it
was accepted as bug and this patch fixed it).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22
2003-08-29 23:09 root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22 Michael Pruznick
@ 2003-08-29 23:21 ` Samuel Flory
2003-08-29 23:28 ` Herbert Poetzl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Flory @ 2003-08-29 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael_pruznick; +Cc: linux-kernel
Michael Pruznick wrote:
>Was root=nfs removed on purpose or is it an unexpected
>side effect of the "ROOT NFS fixes" patch from late
>July 2003?
>
>I understand this patch from the point of wanting to
>eliminate nfs attempts when nfs is not requested. That
>is clearly a reasonable thing to do. However, "root=nfs"
>is a nfs request that has been accepted in the past, I've
>been told, because nfs isn't a real device (but maybe it
>was accepted as bug and this patch fixed it).
>
>
>
So something like this doesn't work?
root=/dev/nfs ip=::::::dhcp nfsroot=10.10.1.1:/nfsroot
I know that this was work in rc2.
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22
2003-08-29 23:09 root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22 Michael Pruznick
2003-08-29 23:21 ` Samuel Flory
@ 2003-08-29 23:28 ` Herbert Poetzl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-08-29 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Pruznick; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:09:56PM -0600, Michael Pruznick wrote:
> Was root=nfs removed on purpose or is it an unexpected
> side effect of the "ROOT NFS fixes" patch from late
> July 2003?
not unexpected ...
> I understand this patch from the point of wanting to
> eliminate nfs attempts when nfs is not requested. That
> is clearly a reasonable thing to do. However, "root=nfs"
> is a nfs request that has been accepted in the past, I've
> been told, because nfs isn't a real device (but maybe it
> was accepted as bug and this patch fixed it).
simple, there was a discrepancy between the 'device'
table scanned on boot, and the actual device names
root=/dev/nfs is correct, where root=wossname worked
because it wasn't checked against anything ...
root=/dev/nfs will work for you, otherwise it is a
bug, and we'll have to fix it ...
HTH,
Herbert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-29 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-29 23:09 root=nfs no longer works in 2.4.22 Michael Pruznick
2003-08-29 23:21 ` Samuel Flory
2003-08-29 23:28 ` Herbert Poetzl
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.