All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
@ 2003-09-12 23:58 Ion Badulescu
  2003-09-13  0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ion Badulescu @ 2003-09-12 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: autofs

Sorry, I got the autofs list address wrong the first time around. -Ion

---------- Forwarded message ----------

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:11:40 -0700, Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com> wrote:

> We've seen a few "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice day.." messages on a dual processor NFS client. Here's the use case:
> 
> - Due to network load issues, the NFS server becomes unreachable for some time
> - The automounter tries to expire the mount
> - The unmount finds a couple of busy inodes. Putting some debug printks shows that typically two inodes are busy i.e. have inode->i_count == 1. But they don't have any waiters on inode->i_wait. Further, the inodes that are busy are
> /mnt/foo     -> autofs mount point
> /mnt/foo/bar -> bar is a symbolic link
> 
> It's not clear if this is a NFS issue or a autofs issue, but it's seen often with autofs. Are there any known race conditions that have been fixed after 2.4.20 ? The two calls I'm worried about are:
> 
> fs/autofs/root.c:305:    d_instantiate(dentry, iget(dir->i_sb,ent->ino));
> fs/autofs/root.c:416:    d_instantiate(dentry, iget(dir->i_sb,ino));

I don't know if it's the same issue, but I've seen it many many times 
while testing amd's autofs functionality. It occurs when a non-empty 
autofs filesystem is unmounted, e.g. if it has some leftover 
subdirectories from previous mounts. Therefore I'd say it's quite 
clearly an autofs issue, at least in my case.

Do you see it when shutting down the automounter, or in other cases as 
well?

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-12 23:58 [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP Ion Badulescu
@ 2003-09-13  0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-09-13  0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ion Badulescu; +Cc: autofs

Ion Badulescu wrote:
> 
> I don't know if it's the same issue, but I've seen it many many times 
> while testing amd's autofs functionality. It occurs when a non-empty 
> autofs filesystem is unmounted, e.g. if it has some leftover 
> subdirectories from previous mounts. Therefore I'd say it's quite 
> clearly an autofs issue, at least in my case.
> 
> Do you see it when shutting down the automounter, or in other cases as 
> well?
> 

This happens when *any* filesystem allows itself to be unmounted without
proper cleanup.  If it happens in normal operation, it is more likely an
NFS problem.  If it happens on automounter shutdown, it's likely an
autofs problem.

	-hpa

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-15 21:42 ` [NFS] " Arun Sharma
@ 2003-09-15 22:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2003-09-15 22:34     ` Arun Sharma
                       ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-09-15 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arun Sharma; +Cc: Ion Badulescu, autofs, nfs

Arun Sharma wrote:
>>
>> Oh yeah, easily. Kill the automounter while some things are mounted,
>> unmount everything by hand but do not rmdir the mountpoints. When you
>> unmount the autofs filesystem itself, you will get the self destruct
>> message.
> 
> Thanks. This reproduces the problem I'm chasing very well. I think this
> is clearly an unacceptable kernel bug.
> 
Indeed.  This is on autofs 3?

	-hpa

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-15 22:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2003-09-15 22:34     ` Arun Sharma
  2003-09-15 23:42     ` Ion Badulescu
  2003-09-16 20:37     ` Arun Sharma
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arun Sharma @ 2003-09-15 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Ion Badulescu, autofs, nfs

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> Indeed.  This is on autofs 3?

Yes.

	-Arun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-15 22:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2003-09-15 22:34     ` Arun Sharma
@ 2003-09-15 23:42     ` Ion Badulescu
  2003-09-16 20:37     ` Arun Sharma
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ion Badulescu @ 2003-09-15 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Arun Sharma, autofs, nfs

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Arun Sharma wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh yeah, easily. Kill the automounter while some things are mounted,
> >> unmount everything by hand but do not rmdir the mountpoints. When you
> >> unmount the autofs filesystem itself, you will get the self destruct
> >> message.
> > 
> > Thanks. This reproduces the problem I'm chasing very well. I think this
> > is clearly an unacceptable kernel bug.
> > 
> Indeed.  This is on autofs 3?

Both 3 and 4, at least as far as the "self-destruct" message goes.

Ion

-- 
  It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
            than to open it and remove all doubt.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-15 22:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2003-09-15 22:34     ` Arun Sharma
  2003-09-15 23:42     ` Ion Badulescu
@ 2003-09-16 20:37     ` Arun Sharma
  2003-09-16 20:54       ` H. Peter Anvin
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arun Sharma @ 2003-09-16 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Ion Badulescu, autofs

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> Indeed.  This is on autofs 3?
> 

Correction: the problem was primarily seen on autofs4. However the oops that I reported yesterday was autofs3. So the problem affects both.

	-Arun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP
  2003-09-16 20:37     ` Arun Sharma
@ 2003-09-16 20:54       ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2003-09-16 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arun Sharma; +Cc: Ion Badulescu, autofs

Arun Sharma wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>>
>> Indeed.  This is on autofs 3?
>>
> 
> Correction: the problem was primarily seen on autofs4. However the oops
> that I reported yesterday was autofs3. So the problem affects both.
> 
>     -Arun

Thanks.  That's useful information.

	-hpa

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-16 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-12 23:58 [NFS] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount on 2 way SMP Ion Badulescu
2003-09-13  0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-13  0:16 Ion Badulescu
2003-09-15 21:42 ` [NFS] " Arun Sharma
2003-09-15 22:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-09-15 22:34     ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-15 23:42     ` Ion Badulescu
2003-09-16 20:37     ` Arun Sharma
2003-09-16 20:54       ` H. Peter Anvin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.