From: simon@voxel.at (DI Dr Simon Vogl)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: linux-2.4/MAINTAINERS, i2c drivers
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F73DC39.3030805@voxel.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1064476786.3f72a0728dbdb@imp.gcu.info>
Hi,
well really, I have been quiet -- I finished my PhD in winter
and several projects kept me busy. As I don't see much free time
for me to restart active development in this area, I am perfectly
happy with this change.
Simon
Jean Delvare wrote:
> (Looks like simon@tk.uni-linz.ac.at doesn't work anymore.)
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:59:46 +0200
> From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> To: Simon Vogl <simon@tk.uni-linz.ac.at>, Frodo Looijaard
> <frodol@dds.nl>
> Cc: sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com, greg@kroah.com
> Subject: linux-2.4/MAINTAINERS, i2c drivers
>
>
>
> Dear Simon and Frodo,
>
> I am planning to submit a patch to the MAINTAINERS file in Linux 2.4.
> It seems that the "I2C DRIVERS" record is out of date. Frodo regularly
> forwards mails to our mailing list. I haven't heard from Simon for
> months. You both made remarkable work on Linux I2C layer, but maybe it's
> time to update the record to point to active developers, lists and web
> sites. It would ease communications between all actors, wouldn't it?
>
> I volunteer to be the new maintainer of the i2c subsystem in 2.4. Greg
> is already doing a great job in 2.6.
>
> To the questions now:
>
> Is a record update OK?
>
> Are the following mailing list and web site still alive?
> L: linux-i2c@pelican.tk.uni-linz.ac.at
> W: http://www.tk.uni-linz.ac.at/~simon/private/i2c
> Should they be kept in the record?
>
> Here is my proposal of new record. Please tell me what you do think
> about it:
>
> I2C DRIVERS
> P: Jean Delvare
> M: khali@linux-fr.org
> L: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
> W: http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
> S: Maintained
>
> Would it make sense to split the record into "I2C SUBSYSTEM" and "SENSOR
> DRIVERS"? "I2C DRIVERS" doesn't really make sense, there are much more
> I2C drivers in the kernel than just ours. On the other hand, we have
> non-sensor drivers in our repository.
>
> Comments welcome.
>
>
--
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Simon Vogl ! http://www.voxel.at/
VoXel Interaction Design ! office@voxel.at
Breitwiesergutstr. 50 ! +43 650 2323 555
A-4020 Linz - Austria !
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 6:24 linux-2.4/MAINTAINERS, i2c drivers Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` DI Dr Simon Vogl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F73DC39.3030805@voxel.at \
--to=simon@voxel.at \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.