[parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH] linuxthreads for hppa (1/3)

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Ulrich,
> 
> 
>>- -# if __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT != 0
>>- -  __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER;
>>- -  __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_INITIALIZER;
>>+# ifdef __LT_INITIALIZER_NOT_ZERO
>>+  __pthread_handles[0].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER;
>>+  __pthread_handles[1].h_lock = __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER;
>>
>>part is what I meant.  There is no reason to change the name.
> 
> 
> How do you propose it be handled? All arches define __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT

I'm talking about this __LOCK_INITIALIZER -> __LOCK_ALT_INITIALIZER
change.  Why do you claim the right to rename the symbol?

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/jYW52ijCOnn/RHQRAsmEAJ0cmMRxfMlyduuTG9TQMnATJVRJQQCgu/Vy
aL6qdcssSoUjY7D7oCnKXII=
=VzEk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----