From: Alice Hennessy <ahennessy@mvista.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Different nand interface
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:17:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F9D8B54.FFB44876@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1067288106.16391.5.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk
David Woodhouse wrote:
> What is wrong with your mail user agent? It's customary to wrap lines at
> seventy-something characters; not to wrap them at 90 then again at 70,
> giving alternate 70-char and 20-char lines... :)
>
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:43 -0800, Alice Hennessy wrote:
> > The hardware logic uses register access for special commands.
> > Readid,
> > status does
> > 2 writes to a register, one for address (to distinquish which flash),
> > one for
> > command and one more
> > to read. Erase takes 2 writes to a register, address then command.
> > The
> > out-of-band access
> > uses a register to give a command and then the out-of-band data is
> > read using
> >
> > readb with offset.
>
> That's just bizarre. I don't think I want to ask _why_ they did this.
>
> You may be able to massage this into the generic NAND code; you can
> override nand_command() completely. I suspect you won't be using much of
> the generic code if you do that though. You might end up just writing a
> standalone driver.
>
> --
> dwmw2
I'll try to fix the email thing :-)
Thanks for the quick response. I'll weigh the massage effort with any
future maintenance effort saved.
Alice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-27 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-23 21:33 Different nand interface Alice Hennessy
2003-10-24 1:36 ` Joshua Wise
2003-10-24 7:39 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-24 7:41 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 18:25 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-27 20:00 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 20:43 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-27 20:55 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 21:17 ` Alice Hennessy [this message]
2003-10-27 22:29 ` David Woodhouse
2003-11-12 0:49 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-11-18 22:26 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-25 7:29 ` Charles Manning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F9D8B54.FFB44876@mvista.com \
--to=ahennessy@mvista.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.