* LM sensors and 2.6 kernel...
2005-05-19 6:24 LM sensors and 2.6 kernel R. Reucher
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Fw: " Mark Studebaker
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Studebaker @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
thanks for testing.
In the short term you'll have to download and install i2c-CVS to get
i2c-proc.h.
let us know how it goes.
We'll have to think about a long-term solution.
"R. Reucher" wrote:
>
> Thanks for your replies, Mark & Mark :)... but I'm stuck at compilation of
> lm_sensors2 right now.
>
> Two problems, one "solved" (or worked around): first, there was a missing
> dependency (mach_mpspec.h) which I solved by adding another Linux kernel
> include dir "$(LINUX_HEADERS)/asm/mach-default" to the top-level Makefile.
> This is okay for me, but I think the Makefile needs a more generic and
> automated detection of the selected subarchitecture type... please ignore my
> ignorance, if I'm talking about things I'm not very familiar with :). I'm new
> to I2C and lm_sensors, but an experienced programmer myself.
>
> The second missing dependency is "i2c-proc.h". When I understand it correctly,
> 2.6.0-xxx doesn't support /proc/bus/i2c any longer. Please correct me, if I'm
> wrong, but at least I couldn't find any thing like that in the new kernel...
> or am I doing/guessing something totally wrong here?
>
> votan:~/src/lm_sensors2 # make user
> make: *** No rule to make target `linux/i2c-proc.h', needed by
> `kernel/chips/vt1211.d'. Stop.
>
> Up to this point it compiles like a charme... but I can't get around this one,
> because there is no "i2c-proc.h" in the kernel includes.
>
> Hope my tests help supporting 2.6 in any way.
>
> Regards, Rene
> --
> Ren? Reucher
> BATCOM IT Services
>
> Tel: +49 160 94957806
> FAX: +49 6359 205423
> rene.reucher@batcom-it.net
> http://www.batcom-it.net/
> _____________________________________
> V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Fw: LM sensors and 2.6 kernel...
2005-05-19 6:24 LM sensors and 2.6 kernel R. Reucher
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Studebaker @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
thanks for testing.
You are correct, sensors-detect hasn't been ported yet.
In the meantime you may wish to try modprobing every driver
in drivers/i2c/chips, maybe you'll get lucky.
"R. Reucher" wrote:
>
> Hi Mark!
>
> Hmm, my answer to the sensors-list (sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com) was rejected
> (but worked before)... so I'll forward the message directly to you. Hope this
> is okay.
>
> "R. Reucher" <rene.reucher@batcom-it.net> wrote:
>
> > Mark Studebaker <mds@paradyne.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've checked in a Makefile fix.
> > > you may also be able to build by using 'make -k user' to skip the
> > > dependency build errors.
> > Thanks! This one works great, at least I can compile and install the
> userland
> > tools now... and after mounting the sysfs (which I "forgot" before :) I was
> > even able to basically use lm_sensors2 (/usr/local/bin/sensors).
> >
> > But it can't find sensor devices yet... and so I tried
> > /usr/local/sbin/sensors-detect, but it fails at some point, because it
> > apparently still expects /proc/bus/i2c:
> >
> > votan:~ # /usr/local/sbin/sensors-detect
> >
> > This program will help you determine which I2C/SMBus modules you need to
> > load to use lm_sensors most effectively. You need to have i2c and
> > lm_sensors installed before running this program.
> > Also, you need to be `root', or at least have access to the /dev/i2c-*
> > files, for most things.
> > If you have patched your kernel and have some drivers built in, you can
> > safely answer NO if asked to load some modules. In this case, things may
> > seem a bit confusing, but they will still work.
> >
> > BIOS vendor (ACPI): PTLTD
> > System vendor (DMI): TYAN
> > We can start with probing for (PCI) I2C or SMBus adapters.
> > You do not need any special privileges for this.
> > Do you want to probe now? (YES/no):
> > Probing for PCI bus adapters...
> > Use driver `i2c-amd756' for device 00:07.3: AMD-768 System Management
> > Probe succesfully concluded.
> >
> > We will now try to load each adapter module in turn.
> > Load `i2c-amd756' (say NO if built into your kernel)? (YES/no):
> > Module loaded succesfully.
> > Do you now want to be prompted for non-detectable adapters? (yes/NO):
> > To continue, we need module `i2c-dev' to be loaded.
> > If it is built-in into your kernel, you can safely skip this.
> > i2c-dev is not loaded. Do you want to load it now? (YES/no):
> > Module loaded succesfully.
> >
> > We are now going to do the adapter probings. Some adapters may hang halfway
> > through; we can't really help that. Also, some chips will be double
> detected;
> > we choose the one with the highest confidence value in that case.
> > If you found that the adapter hung after probing a certain address, you can
> > specify that address to remain unprobed. That often
> > includes address 0x69 (clock chip).
> > Couldn't open /proc/bus/i2c?!? at /usr/local/sbin/sensors-detect line 4184,
> > <STDIN> line 4.
> >
> > Well, seem's that some more porting effort to sysfs has to be done next :)!
> >
> > Loaded i2c modules up to this point and other information of possible
> > interest:
> >
> > votan:~ # lsmod | grep i2c
> > i2c_dev 10304 0
> > i2c_amd756 6852 0
> > i2c_core 23176 2 i2c_dev,i2c_amd756
> >
> > votan:~ # mount | grep sysfs
> > none on /sys type sysfs (rw)
> >
> > votan:~ # ls -alR /sys/class/i2c-*
> > /sys/class/i2c-adapter:
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 0 Nov 22 2003 ../
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 i2c-0/
> >
> > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0:
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ../
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Nov 22 13:16 device ->
> > ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:07.3/i2c-0/
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 Nov 22 13:16 driver ->
> > ../../../bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_adapter/
> >
> > /sys/class/i2c-dev:
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 0 Nov 22 2003 ../
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 i2c-0/
> >
> > /sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0:
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 22 13:16 ../
> > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 22 13:16 dev
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Nov 22 13:16 device ->
> > ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:07.3/
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Nov 22 13:16 driver ->
> > ../../../bus/pci/drivers/amd75x smbus/
> >
> > Let me know if you need more info!
> >
> > Regards and thanks for efforts,
> >
> > Rene
> > --
> > Ren? Reucher
> > BATCOM IT Services
> >
> > Tel: +49 160 94957806
> > FAX: +49 6359 205423
> > rene.reucher@batcom-it.net
> > http://www.batcom-it.net/
> > _____________________________________
> > V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ren? Reucher
> BATCOM IT Services
>
> Tel: +49 160 94957806
> FAX: +49 6359 205423
> rene.reucher@batcom-it.net
> http://www.batcom-it.net/
> _____________________________________
> V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* LM sensors and 2.6 kernel...
2005-05-19 6:24 LM sensors and 2.6 kernel R. Reucher
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Fw: " Mark Studebaker
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Studebaker @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
I've checked in a Makefile fix.
you may also be able to build by using 'make -k user' to skip the
dependency build errors.
Mark Studebaker wrote:
>
> thanks for testing.
> In the short term you'll have to download and install i2c-CVS to get
> i2c-proc.h.
> let us know how it goes.
> We'll have to think about a long-term solution.
>
> "R. Reucher" wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your replies, Mark & Mark :)... but I'm stuck at compilation of
> > lm_sensors2 right now.
> >
> > Two problems, one "solved" (or worked around): first, there was a missing
> > dependency (mach_mpspec.h) which I solved by adding another Linux kernel
> > include dir "$(LINUX_HEADERS)/asm/mach-default" to the top-level Makefile.
> > This is okay for me, but I think the Makefile needs a more generic and
> > automated detection of the selected subarchitecture type... please ignore my
> > ignorance, if I'm talking about things I'm not very familiar with :). I'm new
> > to I2C and lm_sensors, but an experienced programmer myself.
> >
> > The second missing dependency is "i2c-proc.h". When I understand it correctly,
> > 2.6.0-xxx doesn't support /proc/bus/i2c any longer. Please correct me, if I'm
> > wrong, but at least I couldn't find any thing like that in the new kernel...
> > or am I doing/guessing something totally wrong here?
> >
> > votan:~/src/lm_sensors2 # make user
> > make: *** No rule to make target `linux/i2c-proc.h', needed by
> > `kernel/chips/vt1211.d'. Stop.
> >
> > Up to this point it compiles like a charme... but I can't get around this one,
> > because there is no "i2c-proc.h" in the kernel includes.
> >
> > Hope my tests help supporting 2.6 in any way.
> >
> > Regards, Rene
> > --
> > Ren? Reucher
> > BATCOM IT Services
> >
> > Tel: +49 160 94957806
> > FAX: +49 6359 205423
> > rene.reucher@batcom-it.net
> > http://www.batcom-it.net/
> > _____________________________________
> > V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* LM sensors and 2.6 kernel...
2005-05-19 6:24 LM sensors and 2.6 kernel R. Reucher
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> Good timing. Mark Studebaker just committed some code to CVS. Look
> here at the bottom of the page:
>
> http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/download.html
FYI, you can point people to:
http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/download.html#cvs
I've set an anchor to allow that some times ago.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread