* udelay(500) in amd8111 and nforce2
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Studebaker @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
This is definitely no good.
The preferred implementation is #if'ed out in nforce2.
Does somebody have these chips to test the fix or
should we just change it w/o testing first?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* udelay(500) in amd8111 and nforce2
2005-05-19 6:24 udelay(500) in amd8111 and nforce2 Mark Studebaker
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> This is definitely no good.
> The preferred implementation is #if'ed out in nforce2.
> Does somebody have these chips to test the fix or
> should we just change it w/o testing first?
My girlfriend has ordered a new motherboard a few days ago, and should
receive it soon. I think it has a nForce2 on it, so I might be able to
do some tests on it at that time (say in one week or so).
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-19 6:24 udelay(500) in amd8111 and nforce2 Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.