* ipt_do_table
@ 2004-01-07 19:54 Thomas Heinz
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Thomas Heinz @ 2004-01-07 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]
Hi
Why does ipt_do_table use read_lock_bh instead of read_lock?
The concurrent counter snapshot resp. table modification
operations acquiring the write lock run in process context
and ipt_do_table itself should be reentrant.
What am I missing?
Regards,
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-01-07 19:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-07 19:54 ipt_do_table Thomas Heinz
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.