From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: fix regitster offset of CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2-5
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:34:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b95e362-300a-12af-0d55-76672c60be9f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1680169620-26012-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2023-03-30 10:47, Jing Zhang wrote:
> In the CMN700 specification, it is described that the address offset
> of the mxp_device_connect_info_p0-5 register is 16'h8 + #{8*index}.
> Therefore, the address offset of the CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2-5 macro
> defined in the code is wrong, which causes the cmn700 topology map
> incorrect printed in debugfs.
>
> So correct the address offset value to make the cmn700 topology map
> correct in debugfs.
>
> Fixes: 60d1504070c2 ("perf/arm-cmn: Support new IP features")
Ugh, these offsets are correct for CI-700, so strictly that commit is
fine. What I failed to notice is that CMN-700 shuffled the
mesh_port_connect_info registers out of the way, so it's commit
23760a014417 which should have added more handling for this difference.
Thanks,
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 1deb61b..e9f844b 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -59,10 +59,10 @@
> /* XPs also have some local topology info which has uses too */
> #define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P0 0x0008
> #define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P1 0x0010
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2 0x0028
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P3 0x0030
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P4 0x0038
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P5 0x0040
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2 0x0018
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P3 0x0020
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P4 0x0028
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P5 0x0030
> #define CMN__CONNECT_INFO_DEVICE_TYPE GENMASK_ULL(4, 0)
>
> /* PMU registers occupy the 3rd 4KB page of each node's region */
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: fix regitster offset of CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2-5
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:34:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b95e362-300a-12af-0d55-76672c60be9f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1680169620-26012-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2023-03-30 10:47, Jing Zhang wrote:
> In the CMN700 specification, it is described that the address offset
> of the mxp_device_connect_info_p0-5 register is 16'h8 + #{8*index}.
> Therefore, the address offset of the CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2-5 macro
> defined in the code is wrong, which causes the cmn700 topology map
> incorrect printed in debugfs.
>
> So correct the address offset value to make the cmn700 topology map
> correct in debugfs.
>
> Fixes: 60d1504070c2 ("perf/arm-cmn: Support new IP features")
Ugh, these offsets are correct for CI-700, so strictly that commit is
fine. What I failed to notice is that CMN-700 shuffled the
mesh_port_connect_info registers out of the way, so it's commit
23760a014417 which should have added more handling for this difference.
Thanks,
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 1deb61b..e9f844b 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -59,10 +59,10 @@
> /* XPs also have some local topology info which has uses too */
> #define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P0 0x0008
> #define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P1 0x0010
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2 0x0028
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P3 0x0030
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P4 0x0038
> -#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P5 0x0040
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2 0x0018
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P3 0x0020
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P4 0x0028
> +#define CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P5 0x0030
> #define CMN__CONNECT_INFO_DEVICE_TYPE GENMASK_ULL(4, 0)
>
> /* PMU registers occupy the 3rd 4KB page of each node's region */
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 9:47 [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: fix regitster offset of CMN_MXP__CONNECT_INFO_P2-5 Jing Zhang
2023-03-30 9:47 ` Jing Zhang
2023-03-30 10:34 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-03-30 10:34 ` Robin Murphy
2023-04-03 7:45 ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-03 7:45 ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-03 9:40 ` Robin Murphy
2023-04-03 9:40 ` Robin Murphy
2023-04-03 9:42 ` Jing Zhang
2023-04-03 9:42 ` Jing Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b95e362-300a-12af-0d55-76672c60be9f@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.