Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: Add DT bindings for Kryo EDAC

[Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>]

Hi James,

On 2020-01-16 00:18, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> (CC: +Tyler)
> 
> On 05/12/2019 09:53, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> This adds DT bindings for Kryo EDAC implemented with RAS
>> extensions on KRYO{3,4}XX CPU cores for reporting of cache
>> errors.
> 
> KRYO{3,4}XX isn't the only SoC with the RAS extensions. The DT needs
> to convey the range
> of ways this armv8 RAS extensions stuff can be wired up.
> 

Right, but I was going for Kryo specific implementation and hence the 
binding as such.

> The folk who look after the ACPI specs have made a start:
> https://static.docs.arm.com/den0085/a/DEN0085_RAS_ACPI_1.0_BETA_1.pdf
> 
> (I suspect that isn't the latest version, I'll try and find out)
> 

That would be helpful, thanks.

> I'd like the ACPI table and DT to convey the same information so that
> we don't need to
> convert or infer things in the driver. If something is missing, we
> should get it added!
> 

Sure, I think it is decided now that kernel first RAS implementation 
will be generic.

> 
>> diff --git 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/qcom-kryo-edac.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/qcom-kryo-edac.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1a39429a73b4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/qcom-kryo-edac.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/edac/qcom-kryo-edac.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Kryo Error Detection and Correction(EDAC)
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> +  Kryo EDAC is defined to describe on-chip error detection and 
>> correction
>> +  for the Kryo CPU cores which implement RAS extensions.
> 
> Please don't make this Kryo specific, otherwise this binding becomes
> an extra thing we
> need to support with a 'v8.2 RAS' driver.
> 
> What I'd like is a single 'armv82_ras' edac driver that handles faults
> and errors reported
> by interrupts, and interacts with the arch code's handling of
> 'external aborts'. This
> should work for all platforms using v8.2 RAS and later.
> 
> 

Ok sure.

>> +  It will report
>> +  all Single Bit Errors and Double Bit Errors found in L1/L2 caches 
>> in
>> +  in two registers ERXSTATUS_EL1 and ERXMISC0_EL1. L3-SCU cache 
>> errors
>> +  are reported in ERR1STATUS and ERR1MISC0 registers.
>> +    ERXSTATUS_EL1 - Selected Error Record Primary Status Register, 
>> EL1
>> +    ERXMISC0_EL1 - Selected Error Record Miscellaneous Register 0, 
>> EL1
>> +    ERR1STATUS - Error Record Primary Status Register
>> +    ERR1MISC0 - Error Record Miscellaneous Register 0
>> +  Current implementation of Kryo ECC(Error Correcting Code) mechanism 
>> is
>> +  based on interrupts.
> 
> Your SoC picked the system registers as the interface to these
> component's registers.
> The binding would need to specify which index the 'l1-l2' records
> start at, and how many
> there are. The same for the 'l3-scu'. You can't hard code these, they
> are different on
> other platforms.
> 

Ok will keep this in mind for the next version.

> There is also an MMIO interface which needs a base address, along with
> the index and
> ranges. (which may be different). The same component may use both the
> system register and
> the MMIO interface.
> 

I have some doubts here, Where do I get this info? Will this be 
implementation specific?

> This stuff is likely to vary on big/little systems, so you need a way
> of describing which
> CPUs the settings refer to. This probably isn't something the ACPI
> tables capture as ACPI
> machines are typically homogenous.
> 

Our SoCs are based on big.LITTLE arch, so this will be needed.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation