All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Yinghua Pan <ot_yinghua.pan@mediatek.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx handling with two NAPIs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:44:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f42845aafce14dcd96a83690fe296eb9eb6b50d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220623213431.23528544@kernel.org>

Dear Jakub,
	Thanks for your comments~

On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 21:34 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:05:44 +0800 Biao Huang wrote:
> > +	if (rx || tx) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		/* mask Rx and TX Complete interrupt */
> > +		mtk_star_disable_dma_irq(priv, rx, tx);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> 
> You do _irqsave / _irqrestore here
We should invoke spin_lock, no need save/store irq here.
> 
> > +		if (rx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->rx_napi);
> > +		if (tx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->tx_napi);
> 
> Yet assume _irqoff here.
> 
> So can this be run from non-IRQ context or not?
seems __napi_schedule is more proper for our case, we'll modify it in
next send.
> 
> > -	if (mtk_star_ring_full(ring))
> > +	if (unlikely(mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
> >  		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> 
> Please look around other drivers (like ixgbe) and copy the way they
> handle safe stopping of the queues. You need to add some barriers and
> re-check after disabling.
Yes, we look drivers from other vendors, and will do similar thing in
next send.
> 
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
> > -
> >  	mtk_star_dma_resume_tx(priv);
> >  
> >  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> 
> 
> > +	while ((entry != head) && (count < MTK_STAR_RING_NUM_DESCS -
> > 1)) {
> >  
> 
> Parenthesis unnecessary, so is the empty line after the while ().
Yes, the empty line will be removed in next send.
> 
> >  		ret = mtk_star_tx_complete_one(priv);
> >  		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> > +
> > +		count++;
> > +		pkts_compl++;
> > +		bytes_compl += ret;
> > +		entry = ring->tail;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	__netif_tx_lock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> >  	netdev_completed_queue(ndev, pkts_compl, bytes_compl);
> > +	__netif_tx_unlock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> 
> what are you taking this lock for?
In this version, we encounter some issue related to
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF, 
and if we add __netif_tx_lock_bh here, it disappears.

When recieve your comments, we survey netdev_completed_queue handles in
drivers from other vendors, we beleive the __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF
issue may caused by unproper usage of __napi_schedule_irqoff in
previous lines, and we'll remove __netif_tx_lock_bh, and have another
try.

If our local stress test pass, corresponding modification will be added
in next send.
> 
> > -	if (wake && netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
> > +	if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(ndev)) &&
> > +	    (mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) > MTK_STAR_TX_THRESH))
> >  		netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> >  
> > -	spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > +	if (napi_complete(napi)) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		mtk_star_enable_dma_irq(priv, false, true);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -1475,6 +1514,7 @@ static int mtk_star_set_timing(struct
> > mtk_star_priv *priv)
> >  
> >  	return regmap_write(priv->regs, MTK_STAR_REG_TEST0, delay_val);
> >  }
> > +
> >  static int mtk_star_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *of_node;
> 
> spurious whitespace change
Yes, will fix it in next send.

Best Regards!
Biao

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Yinghua Pan <ot_yinghua.pan@mediatek.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx handling with two NAPIs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:44:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f42845aafce14dcd96a83690fe296eb9eb6b50d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220623213431.23528544@kernel.org>

Dear Jakub,
	Thanks for your comments~

On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 21:34 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:05:44 +0800 Biao Huang wrote:
> > +	if (rx || tx) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		/* mask Rx and TX Complete interrupt */
> > +		mtk_star_disable_dma_irq(priv, rx, tx);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> 
> You do _irqsave / _irqrestore here
We should invoke spin_lock, no need save/store irq here.
> 
> > +		if (rx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->rx_napi);
> > +		if (tx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->tx_napi);
> 
> Yet assume _irqoff here.
> 
> So can this be run from non-IRQ context or not?
seems __napi_schedule is more proper for our case, we'll modify it in
next send.
> 
> > -	if (mtk_star_ring_full(ring))
> > +	if (unlikely(mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
> >  		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> 
> Please look around other drivers (like ixgbe) and copy the way they
> handle safe stopping of the queues. You need to add some barriers and
> re-check after disabling.
Yes, we look drivers from other vendors, and will do similar thing in
next send.
> 
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
> > -
> >  	mtk_star_dma_resume_tx(priv);
> >  
> >  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> 
> 
> > +	while ((entry != head) && (count < MTK_STAR_RING_NUM_DESCS -
> > 1)) {
> >  
> 
> Parenthesis unnecessary, so is the empty line after the while ().
Yes, the empty line will be removed in next send.
> 
> >  		ret = mtk_star_tx_complete_one(priv);
> >  		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> > +
> > +		count++;
> > +		pkts_compl++;
> > +		bytes_compl += ret;
> > +		entry = ring->tail;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	__netif_tx_lock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> >  	netdev_completed_queue(ndev, pkts_compl, bytes_compl);
> > +	__netif_tx_unlock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> 
> what are you taking this lock for?
In this version, we encounter some issue related to
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF, 
and if we add __netif_tx_lock_bh here, it disappears.

When recieve your comments, we survey netdev_completed_queue handles in
drivers from other vendors, we beleive the __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF
issue may caused by unproper usage of __napi_schedule_irqoff in
previous lines, and we'll remove __netif_tx_lock_bh, and have another
try.

If our local stress test pass, corresponding modification will be added
in next send.
> 
> > -	if (wake && netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
> > +	if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(ndev)) &&
> > +	    (mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) > MTK_STAR_TX_THRESH))
> >  		netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> >  
> > -	spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > +	if (napi_complete(napi)) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		mtk_star_enable_dma_irq(priv, false, true);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -1475,6 +1514,7 @@ static int mtk_star_set_timing(struct
> > mtk_star_priv *priv)
> >  
> >  	return regmap_write(priv->regs, MTK_STAR_REG_TEST0, delay_val);
> >  }
> > +
> >  static int mtk_star_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *of_node;
> 
> spurious whitespace change
Yes, will fix it in next send.

Best Regards!
Biao
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22  9:05 [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] add more features for mtk-star-emac Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: store bit_clk_div in compat structure Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: modify IRQ trigger flags Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add support for MT8365 SoC Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] dt-bindings: net: mtk-star-emac: add support for MT8365 Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add clock pad selection for RMII Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add timing adjustment support Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/10] dt-bindings: net: mtk-star-emac: add description for new properties Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add support for MII interface Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx handling with two NAPIs Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang
2022-06-24  4:34   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-24  4:34     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-28  5:44     ` Biao Huang [this message]
2022-06-28  5:44       ` Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: enable half duplex hardware support Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05   ` Biao Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f42845aafce14dcd96a83690fe296eb9eb6b50d.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=biao.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fparent@baylibre.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=macpaul.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ot_yinghua.pan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.