From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:39:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F04294461@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hello All,
Really thankful for your inputs!
> Itanium instruction set is not as compact as some other architectures,
> so the same program will typically require more bytes of code.
I stopped the program on both amd64 machine and ia64 machine and
grepped the values from /proc/<>/status and found the following.
<----Linux IPF----------->
VmSize: 126304 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 6352 kB
VmData: 19696 kB
VmStk: 16 kB
VmExe: 97760 kB
VmLib: 3152 kB
<------------------------>
<------AMD64------------->
VmSize: 100432 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 2828 kB
VmData: 24428 kB
VmStk: 264 kB
VmExe: 62848 kB
VmLib: 3048 kB
<----------------------->
Seems like most of core size(VmSize) on ipf (126MB) is coming from the
code size(VmExe) i.e 97MB. While the code size is just 62MB on amd64.
Looks like IA-64 wastes a lot of VM due to big instruction sizes, so
big instruction sizes will improve performance ? compared small
instruction sizes? , but fetching big instructions surely takes time
compared to small, this may be the reason why amd64 is the fasttest
64-bit process ?
Thanks a lot!
Vamsi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:57:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F04294461@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hello All,
Really thankful for your inputs!
> Itanium instruction set is not as compact as some other architectures,
> so the same program will typically require more bytes of code.
I stopped the program on both amd64 machine and ia64 machine and
grepped the values from /proc/<>/status and found the following.
<----Linux IPF----------->
VmSize: 126304 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 6352 kB
VmData: 19696 kB
VmStk: 16 kB
VmExe: 97760 kB
VmLib: 3152 kB
<------------------------>
<------AMD64------------->
VmSize: 100432 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 2828 kB
VmData: 24428 kB
VmStk: 264 kB
VmExe: 62848 kB
VmLib: 3048 kB
<----------------------->
Seems like most of core size(VmSize) on ipf (126MB) is coming from the
code size(VmExe) i.e 97MB. While the code size is just 62MB on amd64.
Looks like IA-64 wastes a lot of VM due to big instruction sizes, so
big instruction sizes will improve performance ? compared small
instruction sizes? , but fetching big instructions surely takes time
compared to small, this may be the reason why amd64 is the fasttest
64-bit process ?
Thanks a lot!
Vamsi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-16 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 20:36 Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel vamsi krishna
2005-08-16 20:48 ` vamsi krishna
2005-08-16 20:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-08-16 20:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-08-16 20:44 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-16 20:44 ` Luck, Tony
2005-08-16 21:27 ` vamsi krishna [this message]
2005-08-16 21:39 ` vamsi krishna
2005-08-17 19:52 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 Christoph Lameter
2005-08-17 19:52 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel Christoph Lameter
2005-08-18 9:54 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 Alan Cox
2005-08-18 9:54 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel Alan Cox
2005-08-18 18:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-08-18 18:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-08-18 21:28 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 David S. Miller
2005-08-18 21:28 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel David S. Miller
2005-08-18 22:18 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux George Anzinger
2005-08-18 22:18 ` Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel George Anzinger
2005-08-19 11:00 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-19 11:00 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-18 6:55 ` vamsi krishna
2005-08-16 21:05 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-16 21:05 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.