All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
	Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2, 2/7] ppc: bpf/jit: Fix/enhance 32-bit Load Immediate implementation
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:10:12 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3rf4Pc1S8mz9sXy@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d584015e9fb33ed526d693c5ab3c228d385f3c74.1466612260.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2016-22-06 at 16:25:02 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> The existing LI32() macro can sometimes result in a sign-extended 32-bit
> load that does not clear the top 32-bits properly. As an example,
> loading 0x7fffffff results in the register containing
> 0xffffffff7fffffff. While this does not impact classic BPF JIT
> implementation (since that only uses the lower word for all operations),
> we would like to share this macro between classic BPF JIT and extended
> BPF JIT, wherein the entire 64-bit value in the register matters. Fix
> this by first doing a shifted LI followed by ORI.
> 
> An additional optimization is with loading values between -32768 to -1,
> where we now only need a single LI.
> 
> The new implementation now generates the same or less number of
> instructions.
> 
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/aaf2f7e09932a08c1287d8e4c6

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-28 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22 16:25 [PATCHv2 0/7] eBPF JIT for PPC64 Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] ppc bpf/jit: Disable classic BPF JIT on ppc64le Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:50   ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-06-23  9:26   ` [PATCHv2,1/7] " Michael Ellerman
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] ppc: bpf/jit: Fix/enhance 32-bit Load Immediate implementation Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-28 12:10   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] ppc: bpf/jit: Optimize 64-bit Immediate loads Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] ppc: bpf/jit: Introduce rotate immediate instructions Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] ppc: bpf/jit: A few cleanups Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] ppc: bpf/jit: Isolate classic BPF JIT specifics into a separate header Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-22 16:25 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF Naveen N. Rao
2016-06-30  9:06 ` [PATCHv2 0/7] eBPF JIT for PPC64 Andreas Ziegler
2016-06-30  9:34   ` Denis Kirjanov
2016-06-30 10:32     ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3rf4Pc1S8mz9sXy@ozlabs.org \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=cascardo@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.