incomplete fsck

incomplete fsck

[David Bernick]

I'm using kernel 2.4.23 and reiserfsck 3.6.11.

I'm doing a --rebuild-tree. After pass0 i get this error. Why could this be?

2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
6449077 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
         "r5" hash is selected
Flushing..finished
         Read blocks (but not data blocks) 122328324
                 Leaves among those 344205
                         - corrected leaves 249
                         - leaves all contents of which could not be saved and 
deleted 5
                 pointers in indirect items to wrong area 1536 (zeroed)
                 Objectids found 6449102

Pass 1 (will try to insert 344200 leaves):
####### Pass 1 #######
Looking for allocable blocks .. finished
0%pass1.c 408 pass1_correct_leaf                         left 342029, 1085 /sec
pass1_correct_leaf: block 1733582, item 36, pointer 0: The wrong pointer 
(1395601712) in the file [7068 52052]. Must be fixed on pass0.
Aborted


Thanks for any help!

Re: incomplete fsck

[Vitaly Fertman]

Hello David, 

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 22:28, David Bernick wrote:
> I'm using kernel 2.4.23 and reiserfsck 3.6.11.
>
> I'm doing a --rebuild-tree. After pass0 i get this error. Why could this
> be?
>
> 2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
> 6449077 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
>          "r5" hash is selected
> Flushing..finished
>          Read blocks (but not data blocks) 122328324
>                  Leaves among those 344205
>                          - corrected leaves 249
>                          - leaves all contents of which could not be saved
> and deleted 5
>                  pointers in indirect items to wrong area 1536 (zeroed)
>                  Objectids found 6449102
>
> Pass 1 (will try to insert 344200 leaves):
> ####### Pass 1 #######
> Looking for allocable blocks .. finished
> 0%pass1.c 408 pass1_correct_leaf                         left 342029, 1085
> /sec pass1_correct_leaf: block 1733582, item 36, pointer 0: The wrong
> pointer (1395601712) in the file [7068 52052]. Must be fixed on pass0.
> Aborted
>
> Thanks for any help!

hm, would you check your RAM and the harddrive?
if they are ok, would you run 
	debugreiserfs -p /dev/xxx | bzip2 -c > xxx.bz2
and provide it for downloading. I will check then how fsck works 
on these data on my computer.

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: incomplete fsck

[David Bernick]

Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> Hello David, 
> 
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 22:28, David Bernick wrote:
> 
>>I'm using kernel 2.4.23 and reiserfsck 3.6.11.
>>
>>I'm doing a --rebuild-tree. After pass0 i get this error. Why could this
>>be?
>>
>>2 directory entries were hashed with not set hash.
>>6449077 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.
>>         "r5" hash is selected
>>Flushing..finished
>>         Read blocks (but not data blocks) 122328324
>>                 Leaves among those 344205
>>                         - corrected leaves 249
>>                         - leaves all contents of which could not be saved
>>and deleted 5
>>                 pointers in indirect items to wrong area 1536 (zeroed)
>>                 Objectids found 6449102
>>
>>Pass 1 (will try to insert 344200 leaves):
>>####### Pass 1 #######
>>Looking for allocable blocks .. finished
>>0%pass1.c 408 pass1_correct_leaf                         left 342029, 1085
>>/sec pass1_correct_leaf: block 1733582, item 36, pointer 0: The wrong
>>pointer (1395601712) in the file [7068 52052]. Must be fixed on pass0.
>>Aborted

Ifigured out what went wrong. The machine was a RAID5 and one of the disks had 
bad blocks. I figured out which disk it was by just scanning each device 
individually. I swapped the disk out and all was good.

Now i'm running the rebuild-tree and it's already on pass3, which is far further 
than before. thanks for all your help!

d


-- 
David Bernick
bernz@bernztech.org

cretin /kret'in/ or /kree'tn/ n.

  Congenital loser;
    an obnoxious person; someone who can't do anything right.  It has
    been observed that many American hackers tend to favor the British
    pronunciation /kret'in/ over standard American /kree'tn/; it is
    thought this may be due to the insidious phonetic influence of
    Monty Python's Flying Circus.