* Re: local connections getting natted
@ 2004-02-04 5:54 prabha
2004-02-04 9:00 ` topic " clister
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: prabha @ 2004-02-04 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clister, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Hi
> 185K 8942K SNAT all -- * eth0 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0
to:1.2.3.4
This rule will change the source address of all the packet going out of
the eth0 interface. (Irrespective of whether they are local packets or
forwarded packets)
>I thought this happened only if you create such rule on NAT::ouput so
local
>connections get natted prior to go out of the box.
The NAT:OUTPUT chain will do a NAT for local packets (ie) packets
generated by the local machine.
>Should i change this to:
>-t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-destination:1.2.3.4
to
>avoid local packets getting natted?
Yes, this should work.
>and last question:
>All packets leaving routing code (local, forwarded) pass througth
>POSTROUTING chain at nat table or only forwarded packets?
Yes, all the packets will pass through the POSTROUTING chain.
Prabha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: topic local connections getting natted
2004-02-04 5:54 local connections getting natted prabha
@ 2004-02-04 9:00 ` clister
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: clister @ 2004-02-04 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: prabha; +Cc: immidi_kiran, netfilter
Hi all
I've probed to include -i eth1 on POSTROUTING but it seems to not accept input interface specificaction on POSTROUTING
chain so i cant separate local packets from forwarded packets by inspecting that.
im going to try marking local packets on FILTER::OUTPUT chain so they get ignored on postrouting chaing.
What Chain should i use for this NAT::OUTPUT or FILTER::OUTPUT so it's seen before NAT::POSTROUTING?
El Miércoles, 4 de Febrero de 2004 06:54, prabha escribió:
> Hi
>
> > 185K 8942K SNAT all -- * eth0 0.0.0.0/0
>
> 0.0.0.0/0
> to:1.2.3.4
>
> This rule will change the source address of all the packet going out of
> the eth0 interface. (Irrespective of whether they are local packets or
> forwarded packets)
>
> >I thought this happened only if you create such rule on NAT::ouput so
>
> local
>
> >connections get natted prior to go out of the box.
>
> The NAT:OUTPUT chain will do a NAT for local packets (ie) packets
> generated by the local machine.
>
> >Should i change this to:
> >-t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-destination:1.2.3.4
>
> to
>
> >avoid local packets getting natted?
>
> Yes, this should work.
>
> >and last question:
> >All packets leaving routing code (local, forwarded) pass througth
> >POSTROUTING chain at nat table or only forwarded packets?
>
> Yes, all the packets will pass through the POSTROUTING chain.
>
> Prabha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Iptables SNMP
@ 2004-02-02 3:28 chandramouli P H
2004-02-03 10:07 ` local connections getting natted clister
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: chandramouli P H @ 2004-02-02 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
I've Firewall Running IPTables with Bridging mode which is in the Private segment.I like to monitor the Firewall from the outside segment using SNMP.Im not sure how will it work if i assign Public IP for outside interface since it is in bridging mode.Any help would be appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------
Still single? Click here to find the perfect match.
http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?141
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* local connections getting natted
2004-02-02 3:28 Iptables SNMP chandramouli P H
@ 2004-02-03 10:07 ` clister
2004-02-04 3:26 ` Kiran Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: clister @ 2004-02-03 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello,
i have a this setup on nat table.
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 1456K packets, 384M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 20 packets, 1192 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
185K 8942K SNAT all -- * eth0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
to:1.2.3.4
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 74 packets, 4622 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Connections coming from eth1 (internal network 10.10.10.x) to eth0 (external)
get natted to to 1.2.3.4 , it's correct for me but whenever i try to connect
from this box to inet i get natted also to 1.2.3.4.
I thought this happened only if you create such rule on NAT::ouput so local
connections get natted prior to go out of the box.
Should i change this to:
-t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-destination:1.2.3.4 to
avoid local packets getting natted?
and last question:
All packets leaving routing code (local, forwarded) pass througth POSTROUTING
chain at nat table or only forwarded packets?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: local connections getting natted
2004-02-03 10:07 ` local connections getting natted clister
@ 2004-02-04 3:26 ` Kiran Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kiran Kumar @ 2004-02-04 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clister, netfilter
--- clister <clister@uah.es> wrote:
> i have a this setup on nat table.
>
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 20 packets, 1192
> bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out
> source
> destination
> 185K 8942K SNAT all -- * eth0
> 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
> to:1.2.3.4
> Connections coming from eth1 (internal network
> 10.10.10.x) to eth0 (external)
> get natted to to 1.2.3.4 , it's correct for me but
> whenever i try to connect
> from this box to inet i get natted also to 1.2.3.4.
Yes, you have specified 0.0.0.0/0 which is
'anywhere'. Packets coming in from anywhere will be
satisfying this match. So local packets get natted as
well. I think you should change your iptable rule to
include -i eth1
>
> I thought this happened only if you create such rule
> on NAT::ouput so local
> connections get natted prior to go out of the box.
Sorry, did not get what you mean by this.
>
> Should i change this to:
> -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o eth0 -j SNAT
> --to-destination:1.2.3.4 to
> avoid local packets getting natted?
Right.
>
> and last question:
> All packets leaving routing code (local, forwarded)
> pass througth POSTROUTING
> chain at nat table or only forwarded packets?
Not sure about this.
=====
Regards,
Kiran Kumar Immidi
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-04 9:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-04 5:54 local connections getting natted prabha
2004-02-04 9:00 ` topic " clister
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-02 3:28 Iptables SNMP chandramouli P H
2004-02-03 10:07 ` local connections getting natted clister
2004-02-04 3:26 ` Kiran Kumar
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.