From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thornber@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests)
Date: Thu Feb 19 20:52:02 2004 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40355F03.9030207@cyberone.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
> Can you see if this patch helps you?
>
This patch isn't actually so good because it doesn't wake
a specific process when it gets below it's limit...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thornber@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40355F03.9030207@cyberone.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
> Can you see if this patch helps you?
>
This patch isn't actually so good because it doesn't wake
a specific process when it gets below it's limit...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-20 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-16 9:11 [linux-lvm] IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-16 8:30 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2004-02-16 9:01 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-16 19:32 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-17 1:46 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-18 10:29 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-18 23:52 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 8:51 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 1:24 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 8:51 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 1:52 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 9:00 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 2:01 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 9:00 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 1:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 8:50 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 2:11 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 9:08 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 2:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 9:08 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 10:15 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 10:23 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 10:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-19 10:26 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2004-02-19 15:58 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 20:59 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 17:52 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 22:52 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 18:52 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 23:53 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 19:15 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-20 0:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 20:16 ` [linux-lvm] [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests) Nick Piggin
2004-02-20 1:12 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 20:25 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 1:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:40 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-20 1:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 21:32 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 14:40 ` [PATCH] bdi_congestion_funp (was: Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests)) Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-23 8:41 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-20 9:56 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2004-02-20 14:59 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-20 9:59 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2004-02-20 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-22 14:02 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-23 8:45 ` [linux-lvm] " Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-22 14:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 9:57 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2004-02-20 14:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-24 12:54 ` [linux-lvm] Queue congestion: passing down vs passing up [PATCH] Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 20:52 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-02-20 1:45 ` [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests) Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 2:51 ` IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 9:11 ` [linux-lvm] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 10:21 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-19 10:26 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.