* We shouldn't get this!
@ 2004-03-02 0:06 Michael James
2004-03-02 0:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-02 4:01 ` Chris Dukes
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael James @ 2004-03-02 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
Dear Reiserfs Listers,
I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
it needs tightening.
michaelj
PS: Dear list moderator,
If you find this quarantined in the
"Post by a non-subscriber" basket
just delete it, you DO have the list tight enough.
I'm testing to see why so much spam gets through.
It's more than all the other lists I subscribe to...
--
Michael James michael@james.st
Network Programmer work: 02 6246 5040
8 Brennan St home: 02 6247 2556
Hackett, ACT 2602 mobile: 04 1747 4065
Worms, crashes, patching, proprietary file formats,
obfuscated network protocols... you pay for this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: We shouldn't get this!
2004-03-02 0:06 We shouldn't get this! Michael James
@ 2004-03-02 0:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-02 1:43 ` Bob Vincent
2004-03-02 4:01 ` Chris Dukes
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-03-02 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Michael James wrote:
> Dear Reiserfs Listers,
>
> I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
> If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
> No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
> it needs tightening.
It's not a help/tech list unless it accepts emails from the unsubscribed.
>
> michaelj
>
> PS: Dear list moderator,
> If you find this quarantined in the
> "Post by a non-subscriber" basket
> just delete it, you DO have the list tight enough.
Do *you* want to moderate the list?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: We shouldn't get this!
2004-03-02 0:53 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2004-03-02 1:43 ` Bob Vincent
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bob Vincent @ 2004-03-02 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Fedyk; +Cc: michael, reiserfs-list
I've got a fairly well-trained bogofilter setup.
I'd be willing to auto-filter the list.
Alternatively, I'd be willing to set up a bayesian filter on the
namesys.com list server itself.
Because I derive benefit from ReiserFS, I wouldn't even charge for my
time.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:53:50PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Michael James wrote:
> >Dear Reiserfs Listers,
> >
> >I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
> >If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
> >No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
> > it needs tightening.
>
> It's not a help/tech list unless it accepts emails from the unsubscribed.
>
> >
> >michaelj
> >
> >PS: Dear list moderator,
> > If you find this quarantined in the
> > "Post by a non-subscriber" basket
> > just delete it, you DO have the list tight enough.
>
> Do *you* want to moderate the list?
--
Robert August Vincent, II
(pronounced "Bob" or "Bob-Vee")
The web is like usenet, but
the elephants are untrained.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: We shouldn't get this!
2004-03-02 0:06 We shouldn't get this! Michael James
2004-03-02 0:53 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2004-03-02 4:01 ` Chris Dukes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Dukes @ 2004-03-02 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael James; +Cc: reiserfs-list
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:06:22AM +1100, Michael James wrote:
> Dear Reiserfs Listers,
>
> I'm sending this from another (unsubscribed) account.
> If you are reading this then the list takes submissions from anybody.
> No wonder there is so much viagra peddled here,
> it needs tightening.
Setup as it's been forever and how it shall be until namesys.com
ends up on more RBLs.
As added joy we get to see namesys.com as the injection point,
because to do otherwise would break some broken loop detectors.
We'll start another meta-discussion. Hans will declare "Remove those
people from the list" and not understand why they can keep posting.
So, let's go for something quick and on the topic.
Which filesystems on linux allow
1) On the fly filesystem resizing
2) Better than O(n) directory lookups
3) Online tail merging
4) Are in the stock kernel tree.
Then I can unsubscribe and slightly reduce the spam in my inbox.
--
Chris Dukes
Been there, done that, got the slightly-charred t-shirt. -- Crowder
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-02 4:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-02 0:06 We shouldn't get this! Michael James
2004-03-02 0:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-02 1:43 ` Bob Vincent
2004-03-02 4:01 ` Chris Dukes
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.