From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:18 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405776058.29534.1393264698347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140224123926.0a44f32e@gandalf.local.home>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:39:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo
> > > Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> > > Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
> > > "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> > > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new
> > > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > (keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site)
> >
> > > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable.
> >
> > Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable
> > ?
>
> The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get
> an ack from Rusty.
Do you mean the internal API semantic change you propose for tracepoints ?
If yes, then how do you consider this a fix worthy of being backported to
stable ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> >
> > This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in
> > a separate thread marked [PATCH].
>
> Yeah, I'll post it out soon enough.
>
> -- Steve
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 23:23 [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-11 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-12 4:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 5:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-13 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-14 0:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-16 23:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-20 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-21 4:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-21 8:10 ` Johannes Berg
2014-02-26 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 15:36 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2014-02-13 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-02-13 15:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 16:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 17:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2014-02-24 18:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 2:53 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 18:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-26 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405776058.29534.1393264698347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.