From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:54:42 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877g8zg0ed.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140211234534.6bc34e57@gandalf.local.home>
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:27:38 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Users have reported being unable to trace non-signed modules loaded
>> > within a kernel supporting module signature.
>>
>> External modules should strive to get out of the 'crap' and
>> 'felony law breaker' categories and we should not make it
>> easier for them to linger in a broken state.
>>
>> Nacked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Well, distributions which sign their modules are sending a pretty strong
"go away" signal already.
I'm ambivalent towards out-of-tree modules, so not tempted unless I see
a bug report indicating a concrete problem. Then we can discuss...
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 23:23 [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-11 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-12 4:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-12 5:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 3:24 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-02-13 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-14 0:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-16 23:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-20 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-20 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-21 4:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-21 8:10 ` Johannes Berg
2014-02-26 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 15:36 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2014-02-13 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-13 21:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-02-13 15:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-13 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-14 3:49 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 16:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 17:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 18:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 2:53 ` Rusty Russell
2014-02-26 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-24 18:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-24 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-26 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-02-26 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877g8zg0ed.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.