From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Explicitly request UFS reset pin on RK3576
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40619400.XM6RcZxFsP@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8960787.MhkbZ0Pkbq@diego>
Am Montag, 19. Januar 2026, 15:42:23 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Montag, 19. Januar 2026, 15:05:16 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Alexey Charkov:
> > Happy to make a v2 with an explicit pull-down. Will wait a bit for any
> > other potential feedback though.
>
> I'd side with Quentin here, having the pin firmly on one state, when no-one
> (board nor driver) is caring would be my preference.
> Especially as Quentin said, this is the hardware-default too.
Also it would be good to send that v2 sooner rather than later, as we're
pretty late in the current development cycle already.
(We're after -rc6 already)
Thanks
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Explicitly request UFS reset pin on RK3576
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40619400.XM6RcZxFsP@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8960787.MhkbZ0Pkbq@diego>
Am Montag, 19. Januar 2026, 15:42:23 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Montag, 19. Januar 2026, 15:05:16 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Alexey Charkov:
> > Happy to make a v2 with an explicit pull-down. Will wait a bit for any
> > other potential feedback though.
>
> I'd side with Quentin here, having the pin firmly on one state, when no-one
> (board nor driver) is caring would be my preference.
> Especially as Quentin said, this is the hardware-default too.
Also it would be good to send that v2 sooner rather than later, as we're
pretty late in the current development cycle already.
(We're after -rc6 already)
Thanks
Heiko
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 9:22 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Explicitly request UFS reset pin on RK3576 Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 9:22 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 11:08 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-19 11:08 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-19 13:43 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 13:43 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 13:58 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-19 13:58 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-19 14:05 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 14:05 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-19 14:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-01-19 14:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-01-20 9:21 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-01-20 9:21 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-01-20 1:39 ` Shawn Lin
2026-01-20 1:39 ` Shawn Lin
2026-01-20 7:13 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-20 7:13 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-01-20 8:55 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-01-20 8:55 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-01-20 10:21 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-20 10:21 ` Quentin Schulz
2026-01-20 10:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-01-20 10:26 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40619400.XM6RcZxFsP@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=alchark@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.