From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: rcar-du: dw-hdmi: Reject modes with a too high clock frequency
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:51:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4080472.x6oRvDE9so@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWwCh2BggD9p9aZrmVziiqPiB2strFvgBBMVhJQ4AQx=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 20:42:53 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:12 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:30:25 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:36 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Implement a .mode_valid() handler in the R-Car glue layer to reject
> >>> modes with an unsupported clock frequency.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> >>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your patch!
> >>
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c
> >>> @@ -35,6 +35,20 @@ static const struct rcar_hdmi_phy_params
> >>> rcar_hdmi_phy_params[] = {
> >>> { ~0UL, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000 },
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +static enum drm_mode_status
> >>> +rcar_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * The maximum supported clock frequency is 297 MHz, as shown
> >>> in the PHY
> >>> + * parameters table.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (mode->clock > 297000)
> >>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> >>
> >> Perhaps you need a check for the lower limit (25 MHz), too?
> >
> > There's no lower limit implied by the rcar_hdmi_phy_params table.
>
> Oh, you mean the table in the driver, not a table in the Hardware User's
> Manual?
Correct, I mean the table in the driver. This patch was prompted by an error
returned from rcar_hdmi_phy_configure() when the mode frequency was too high,
making mode setting failed. I've thus added a .mode_valid() handler to ensure
that invalid modes don't get exposed to upper layers, fixing such use cases as
fbvon on a 4K monitor (where the fbcon was picking a mode advertised as
supported by the driver while its frequency was too high).
> That's why I couldn't find the table, but only a short notice in the HDMI
> section of the Hardware User's Manual, stating:
>
> Pixel clock from 25MHz up to 297MHz
Well, the IP core vendor doesn't allow us to submit patches based on the
content of non-public documentation, so I'm afraid I won't sign such a patch
without being given explicit permission. It's a very stupid game really, but I
don't set the rules :-(
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: rcar-du: dw-hdmi: Reject modes with a too high clock frequency
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:51:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4080472.x6oRvDE9so@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWwCh2BggD9p9aZrmVziiqPiB2strFvgBBMVhJQ4AQx=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 20:42:53 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:12 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 19:30:25 EET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:36 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Implement a .mode_valid() handler in the R-Car glue layer to reject
> >>> modes with an unsupported clock frequency.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> >>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your patch!
> >>
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_dw_hdmi.c
> >>> @@ -35,6 +35,20 @@ static const struct rcar_hdmi_phy_params
> >>> rcar_hdmi_phy_params[] = {
> >>> { ~0UL, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000 },
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +static enum drm_mode_status
> >>> +rcar_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * The maximum supported clock frequency is 297 MHz, as shown
> >>> in the PHY
> >>> + * parameters table.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (mode->clock > 297000)
> >>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> >>
> >> Perhaps you need a check for the lower limit (25 MHz), too?
> >
> > There's no lower limit implied by the rcar_hdmi_phy_params table.
>
> Oh, you mean the table in the driver, not a table in the Hardware User's
> Manual?
Correct, I mean the table in the driver. This patch was prompted by an error
returned from rcar_hdmi_phy_configure() when the mode frequency was too high,
making mode setting failed. I've thus added a .mode_valid() handler to ensure
that invalid modes don't get exposed to upper layers, fixing such use cases as
fbvon on a 4K monitor (where the fbcon was picking a mode advertised as
supported by the driver while its frequency was too high).
> That's why I couldn't find the table, but only a short notice in the HDMI
> section of the Hardware User's Manual, stating:
>
> Pixel clock from 25MHz up to 297MHz
Well, the IP core vendor doesn't allow us to submit patches based on the
content of non-public documentation, so I'm afraid I won't sign such a patch
without being given explicit permission. It's a very stupid game really, but I
don't set the rules :-(
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 16:36 [PATCH v2] drm: rcar-du: dw-hdmi: Reject modes with a too high clock frequency Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 16:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 17:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 17:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 18:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 18:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 18:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 18:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 18:51 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2018-12-04 18:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 19:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 19:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-12-04 19:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-04 19:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-12-11 14:57 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-12-11 14:57 ` Kieran Bingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4080472.x6oRvDE9so@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.