* Interleaved flash chips - basic understanding question
@ 2004-04-26 21:23 Oliver Korpilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Oliver Korpilla @ 2004-04-26 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hello!
I have this 4MB of flash device - a Am29LV800BT on my board.
AMD lists the chips as this:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/FlashMemory/ProductInformation/0,,37_1447_1623_1468%5E1532,00.html
These devices are 16-Bit accessible, mine is 64-bit accessible.
My device is 4 MB = 32 M-Bit = 4 * 8 M-Bit => consists of 4 of these
chips listed above, I guess.
And the bigger erase regions on the single devices are 64KB, and mine
are 4*64 KB= 256 KB
If I understand this right, with a serial setup two flash chips simply
have an address space double as long with the same access width.
My device is interleaved, so if I write a 64-bit date is it actually
distributed like this - 16 Bit into 1st chip, 16 Bit into 2nd, ... ???
And if I erase the 1st region on my device, are then all the 4 first
regions erased??
Am I understanding this right?
Am I required to access a 64-bit-width interleaved flash in 64-bit wide
accesses or can I use "smaller" ones (8, 16, 32 bit)??
Now how to configure the device? How can I make it work, if the driver
seems to be broken (cfi_cmdset_0002.c v 1.62, v 1.93 and v 1.98 don't
seem to work)? (If I set width in octetts, as configurable in 2.4.25, to
8 this doesn't even compile, but 4 does)
Thanks in advance,
Oliver Korpilla
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-04-26 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-26 21:23 Interleaved flash chips - basic understanding question Oliver Korpilla
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.