* IPChains
@ 2004-04-29 17:45 Kevin W. Gagel
2004-04-29 18:07 ` IPChains Cedric Blancher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin W. Gagel @ 2004-04-29 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Has all support been dropped for ipchains?
Is there a need to change from ipchains to iptables?
====================
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
(250) 561-5848 local 448
(250) 562-2131 local 448
--------------------------------------------------------------
The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca
Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email.
--------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IPChains
2004-04-29 17:45 IPChains Kevin W. Gagel
@ 2004-04-29 18:07 ` Cedric Blancher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Blancher @ 2004-04-29 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gagel; +Cc: netfilter
Le jeu 29/04/2004 à 19:45, Kevin W. Gagel a écrit :
> Has all support been dropped for ipchains?
ipchains support has been dropped from 2.6 kernels.
> Is there a need to change from ipchains to iptables?
As it is not supported since 2.4, I would say yes.
Regarding Netfilter's functionnalities, opposed to ipchains ones, I
would say DE-FI-NI-TLY yes. Stateful filtering is a major improvement,
for both security and ease of ruleset writing (once understood), and NAT
capabilities are far behond what ipchains can do (all NAT forms
supported), not to mention all available matches and targets, mangle
stuff and existing extensions such as l7-filter.
So, imho, the question would be, is there any need to stay with ipchains
on new kernels ? Except lazyness of course :)
--
http://www.netexit.com/~sid/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ipchains
@ 2005-06-13 7:53 Partha Bag
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Partha Bag @ 2005-06-13 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Dear Sir,
I am using RedHat 7.2.4.10. When I remove ipchains
using rpm -e ipchains, it is not removed and it give
the message that there are dependencies in lokkit.
In interactive mode during startup, iptables service
starts, but I do not see anything when I use lsmod.
Please help me to sort out the problem.
Thanks & regards.
psbag
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ipchains
@ 2001-06-18 15:57 Ted Gervais
2001-06-18 16:20 ` ipchains Fabian Arias
2001-06-18 17:09 ` ipchains D. Stimits
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ted Gervais @ 2001-06-18 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I just ran into something odd. To me anyways, it was odd.
I just installed and brought up kernel 2.4.5 and my ipchains failed.
So I upgraded to the latest (that I could find) ipchains-1.3.10, and
that also fails.
Has anyone got any version of ipchains to work with the new(er) kernels?
---
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
-- Voltaire
Ted Gervais <ve1drg@ve1drg.com>
44.135.34.201 linux.ve1drg.ampr.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: ipchains
2001-06-18 15:57 ipchains Ted Gervais
@ 2001-06-18 16:20 ` Fabian Arias
2001-06-18 17:09 ` ipchains D. Stimits
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Arias @ 2001-06-18 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ted Gervais; +Cc: linux-kernel
ronto:~# uname -r
2.4.5-ac15
ronto:~# ipchains --version
ipchains 1.3.10, 1-Sep-2000
ronto:~# ipchains -L
Chain input (policy ACCEPT):
target prot opt source destination ports
DENY all ----l- pD951B780.dip.t-dialin.net anywhere
n/a
DENY all ----l- CM-46-30.chello.cl anywhere n/a
DENY all ----l- 199.103.178.1 anywhere n/a
......
Are you shure you get it right into the kernel?.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I just ran into something odd. To me anyways, it was odd.
> I just installed and brought up kernel 2.4.5 and my ipchains failed.
> So I upgraded to the latest (that I could find) ipchains-1.3.10, and
> that also fails.
>
> Has anyone got any version of ipchains to work with the new(er) kernels?
>
> ---
> Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
> -- Voltaire
>
> Ted Gervais <ve1drg@ve1drg.com>
> 44.135.34.201 linux.ve1drg.ampr.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
---
Fabian Arias Mu~oz | Debian GNU/Linux Sid
Facultad de Cs. Economicas y | Kernel 2.4.5ac15 - ReiserFS
Administrativas. | "aka" dewback en
Universidad de Concepcion - Chile | #linuxhelp IRC.CHILE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ipchains
2001-06-18 15:57 ipchains Ted Gervais
2001-06-18 16:20 ` ipchains Fabian Arias
@ 2001-06-18 17:09 ` D. Stimits
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: D. Stimits @ 2001-06-18 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ted Gervais; +Cc: linux-kernel
Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> I just ran into something odd. To me anyways, it was odd.
> I just installed and brought up kernel 2.4.5 and my ipchains failed.
> So I upgraded to the latest (that I could find) ipchains-1.3.10, and
> that also fails.
>
> Has anyone got any version of ipchains to work with the new(er) kernels?
>
> ---
> Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
> -- Voltaire
>
> Ted Gervais <ve1drg@ve1drg.com>
> 44.135.34.201 linux.ve1drg.ampr.org
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
It works, but you can't load iptables modules at the same time as
ipchains. Be sure ipchains is the only module you are loading. rmmod any
iptables items before modprobe of ipchains. If you are running redhat,
also do not believe the script in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipchains as to
whether or not ipchains is actually running, it is broken (does not
check return values), and lies and does not tell you when ipchains
startup fails (as root manually do something like ipchains -L -n).
D. Stimits, stimits@idcomm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-13 7:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-29 17:45 IPChains Kevin W. Gagel
2004-04-29 18:07 ` IPChains Cedric Blancher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-13 7:53 ipchains Partha Bag
2001-06-18 15:57 ipchains Ted Gervais
2001-06-18 16:20 ` ipchains Fabian Arias
2001-06-18 17:09 ` ipchains D. Stimits
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.