From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reinstantiating stale inodes
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 23:19:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <409468B2.40200@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083457337.3687.60.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
>So please tell me why the following patch (which addresses the
>particular problem that you raised of someone resetting mtime on the
>parent directory) does not suffice?
>
>
Again this is were I started... and this patch does take care of the ESTALEs
but it also increases normal traffic by 2% to 3% (mostly getattrs and
lookups)
when I ran the connectathon04 tests... Granted 2% to 3% is not that much
of an increase and my testing is not that exact... but.... any increase
for an
error that generally does not happen, I didn't think would be acceptable...
But if this the patch thats going to make it into the 2.4 tree... so be
it....
since it does avoid the ESTALE issues and maybe things will be a bit
more coherent since we do send a few more getattrs and lookups...
Thanks for your guidance.... it is definitely appreciated!
SteveD.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-02 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 14:15 [PATCH] Reinstantiating stale inodes Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 14:33 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-04-23 15:50 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 17:55 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-04-23 18:43 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 18:50 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-04-23 20:07 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 14:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-23 16:01 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 16:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-23 17:21 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 17:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Steve Dickson
[not found] ` <40892DC0.1010001@redhat.com>
2004-04-23 16:04 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-01 16:13 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-01 19:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-01 23:57 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-02 0:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-02 3:19 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2004-05-02 3:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-03 19:50 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-03 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-03 20:33 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-03 21:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-05-04 19:05 ` Steve Dickson
2004-05-06 17:39 ` Steve Dickson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 14:48 Lever, Charles
2004-04-23 15:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-23 16:16 ` Steve Dickson
2004-04-23 15:08 ` Olaf Kirch
2004-04-23 15:17 Lever, Charles
2004-04-23 16:16 Lever, Charles
2004-04-23 16:27 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=409468B2.40200@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.