* [LARTC] Port forwarding/translation control
@ 2004-05-03 21:19 Patrick Turley
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Patrick Turley @ 2004-05-03 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
My Linux system is acting as a NAT'ing firewall, and I have some rules
for doing port forwarding/translation.
I was thinking about this the other day and I realized that there are
other parts of the system that consume ports. Specifically, NAT and
ephemeral port allocation.
It occurs to me that I could potentially have a conflict. If I set up a
rule to forward/translate a port, and the NAT'ing code picks the same
port for what it's doing, then there would be a big problem.
Eventually, I'll need to dynamically allocate ports of my own for
transitory port forwarding/translation. I need a way to set aside some
ports that I can use sure the NAT'ing code and the ephemeral port
allocation code won't try to use.
If anyone has anything illuminating to say on this point, I'd be very
grateful.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-05-03 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-03 21:19 [LARTC] Port forwarding/translation control Patrick Turley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.