All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Kernel-janitors] introduction and first questions
@ 2004-05-26 20:37 Yoon Soo
  2004-05-27 21:50 ` maximilian attems
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yoon Soo @ 2004-05-26 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1011 bytes --]

Hi all,

I am new in this list and there are some points which are not very clear 
to me. But first of all, I read the todo list and worked on the point to 
get rid of the 'old-fashioned' way to access the driver_data field 
direct and replaced them with the proper dev_get/set_drvdata or 
pci_get/set_drvdata.

I created the patch like mentioned in the patchsubmitting-howto of the 
source documentation, and have tested it. What are now the further 
steps, just sending the patch as attachement to this list? Another 
question is, which original source code version should be taken..2.6.6 
(as I did) or the most actual from the cvs tree?

Very many thanks in advance for helping me making the first steps ;)

greets

ys

PS. As I have seen while working on my patch, tty->driver_data should 
also not accessed directly, and for the consistency tty_get_drvdata and 
tty_set_drvdata should be added too and called instead of the direct 
access. Is this the right list to discuss this matter? Or is it in work?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Kernel-janitors] introduction and first questions
  2004-05-26 20:37 [Kernel-janitors] introduction and first questions Yoon Soo
@ 2004-05-27 21:50 ` maximilian attems
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2004-05-27 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel-janitors

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1064 bytes --]

hi yoon,

On Wed, 26 May 2004, Yoon Soo wrote:

...
> I created the patch like mentioned in the patchsubmitting-howto of the 
> source documentation, and have tested it. What are now the further 
> steps, just sending the patch as attachement to this list? Another 
> question is, which original source code version should be taken..2.6.6 
> (as I did) or the most actual from the cvs tree?

the more actual the better, but mention on which version your patch
applies. please send the patch inline to the kj mailinglist, not attached.
take a look at 6) -> SubmittingPatches

do take care not to introduce trailing space
or to convert tabs into spaces 
quick  egrep -n "^\+(.* $|        )" helps.
do not forget to mention in your description the testing 
(just compiled in lack of hardware, or actually run).
 
> Very many thanks in advance for helping me making the first steps ;)

you' ll get more feedback as soon your patches lands.
if you don't get any feedback that may also be a good sign,
and your patch may get into next kj patch set.

good luck
a++ maks


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-27 21:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-26 20:37 [Kernel-janitors] introduction and first questions Yoon Soo
2004-05-27 21:50 ` maximilian attems

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.