All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: schizo@debian.org, mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	prism54-devel@prism54.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/14] prism54: bring up to sync with prism54.org cvs rep
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:24:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B64083.9050200@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040527120544.2fbd4b35.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>> Luis, you, or somebody should create a new patch series with just the 
>> critical fixes, NO WHITESPACE/FORMATTING CHANGES mixed in, and send 
>> those first.
> 
> 
> Whitespace changes are often nice, but they should be the very first
> patch[es] in the series.  You should be able to verify that the .o file was
> unchanged before and after.

Very first, or very last.  I leave that up to the maintainer.


> That way they become a no-brainer and it becomes easier to review and
> understand the substantive changes.

Agreed.

Further, when someone mixes an Lindent in with functional changes, I 
become very suspicious.  That is precisely the method that certain high 
profile Linux hackers have used in the past to intentionally obfuscate 
security changes.

	Jeff



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: schizo@debian.org, mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	prism54-devel@prism54.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/14] prism54: bring up to sync with prism54.org cvs rep
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:24:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B64083.9050200@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040527120544.2fbd4b35.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
>> Luis, you, or somebody should create a new patch series with just the 
>> critical fixes, NO WHITESPACE/FORMATTING CHANGES mixed in, and send 
>> those first.
> 
> 
> Whitespace changes are often nice, but they should be the very first
> patch[es] in the series.  You should be able to verify that the .o file was
> unchanged before and after.

Very first, or very last.  I leave that up to the maintainer.


> That way they become a no-brainer and it becomes easier to review and
> understand the substantive changes.

Agreed.

Further, when someone mixes an Lindent in with functional changes, I 
become very suspicious.  That is precisely the method that certain high 
profile Linux hackers have used in the past to intentionally obfuscate 
security changes.

	Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-27 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-24  8:30 [PATCH 0/14] prism54: bring up to sync with prism54.org cvs rep Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-24  8:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-24  8:57   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-27 18:10   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 19:27     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-05-27 19:32       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 19:45         ` [Prism54-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-27 19:45           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-27 19:56           ` [Prism54-devel] " Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 19:56             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 20:04             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-05-27 18:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 18:25   ` [Prism54-devel] " Clint Adams
2004-05-27 18:25     ` Clint Adams
2004-05-27 18:40     ` [Prism54-devel] " Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 18:40       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 19:05       ` [Prism54-devel] " Andrew Morton
2004-05-27 19:24         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-05-27 19:24           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 18:39 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40B64083.9050200@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=prism54-devel@prism54.org \
    --cc=schizo@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.