All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB MPU
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 07:49:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B99220.1040506@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40A37E1B.8060604@dsl.pipex.com>

Ed Wildgoose wrote:
> 
>>
>> Reading your other post I see your small traffic is ~100b - this would 
>> use three cells, so as a temporary kludge you could set your mpu to 
>> 159 and see how it goes.
>>
>> AFAIK the author of the HTB patch is looking into modifying it to do 
>> the sums properly for DSL. There isn't one answer though - Eds' 
>> formula is fine doing the cells bit, but before this you need to add a 
>> ppp overhead to the IP packet length and this varies with pppoa+vc 
>> mux/pppoe/bridged pppoe and probably other varieties of dsl 
>> implementations.
> 
> 
> 
> I think he said that he is on BT atm based adsl?  Can we perhaps tweak 
> that formula (which is already hardwired) and try to get him something 
> useful.  It sounds like it would be a good vindication for the technique 
> and if it works then we can retro fit it to some modular params which 
> work for more people.  Can't be any worse than the current patch which 
> already doesn't help most adsl users completely...
> In other words, how would I calc the overhead for BT's ppp system?  
> Happy to help write the patch if you can supply the info

See my post to Jason - I think it should be doable, I was just waiting 
to see if it got put into the patch - as the author knows the code and 
has done most of the work already.

Andy.



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-30  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-13 13:54 [LARTC] HTB MPU Andy Furniss
2004-05-13 14:38 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-05-13 17:28 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-05-13 21:59 ` Jason Boxman
2004-05-14  7:05 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-05-14  8:40 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-14  9:55 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-14 17:10 ` Jason Boxman
2004-05-17 22:36 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-17 23:33 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-20  6:29 ` Jason Boxman
2004-05-20 11:13 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-21  8:19 ` syrius.ml
2004-05-24 20:53 ` Jason Boxman
2004-05-24 23:42 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-05-28 18:54 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-28 19:18 ` Jason Boxman
2004-05-28 21:49 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-05-30  7:40 ` Andy Furniss
2004-05-30  7:49 ` Andy Furniss [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40B99220.1040506@dsl.pipex.com \
    --to=andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.