Re: [linuximq] Re: [PATCH] pom-ng version of IMQ target (file is attached this time)

[Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com>]

Brad Fisher wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> 
>>Andre Correa already asked me about inclusion of the IMQ target. I would
>>rather not include at this time it for two reasons:
>>
>>- IMQ still has stability problems
>>- Jamal is working on a netfilter-independant replacement, I would like to
>>see how it works out first. See
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108202471500003&r=1&w=2
>>
>>Regards
>>Patrick
> 
> 
> That's fine, I wasn't really asking for inclusion quite yet (though I would
> like to see it happen someday :).  I just wanted to let people who may be
> interested know that a pom-ng version of the patch existed.
> 
> -Brad

I am still not sure whether using Dummy will satisfy other IMQ users 
though, the thread above just deals with my setup - using ingress IMQ. 
There must be people on here using IMQ for egress/ multiple IMQs to 
solve their own problems. I changed IMQ to hook before NAT for egress, 
just to see if it worked, as someone on the LARTC list wanted to use 
ESFQ for a large NATed LAN - it appears to be OK - but will a netfilter 
independent replacement allow this sort of flexability?

Andy.