* [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth
@ 2004-06-18 15:49 Peter Kaagman
2004-06-18 16:07 ` Ben
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Kaagman @ 2004-06-18 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi there,
I've got the following problem on my hand.....
I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on).
For all these schools we have an internet uplink of 2mbit. And this
bandwidth should be shared as fairly as possible.
So I started reading the the lartc HOWTO but was startled by the
technical terms I found there...... I kinda understand what i meant.....
but would like some advice which option I should further investigate.
What I want to do is spit up the 2mbit pipe in 6. Guarantee 1/6 of the
bandwidth per network and allowing more if it is availlable.
Is this possible? If so which traffic control scheme should I investigate?
regards
Peter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth
2004-06-18 15:49 [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth Peter Kaagman
@ 2004-06-18 16:07 ` Ben
2004-06-18 17:34 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 21:07 ` Peter Kaagman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben @ 2004-06-18 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Yeah, look into HTB. It makes this problem easy.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Peter Kaagman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got the following problem on my hand.....
> I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
> different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
> ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on).
> For all these schools we have an internet uplink of 2mbit. And this
> bandwidth should be shared as fairly as possible.
>
> So I started reading the the lartc HOWTO but was startled by the
> technical terms I found there...... I kinda understand what i meant.....
> but would like some advice which option I should further investigate.
>
> What I want to do is spit up the 2mbit pipe in 6. Guarantee 1/6 of the
> bandwidth per network and allowing more if it is availlable.
>
> Is this possible? If so which traffic control scheme should I investigate?
>
> regards
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth
2004-06-18 15:49 [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth Peter Kaagman
2004-06-18 16:07 ` Ben
@ 2004-06-18 17:34 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 21:07 ` Peter Kaagman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ed Wildgoose @ 2004-06-18 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Peter Kaagman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got the following problem on my hand.....
> I'm a sysop for a school in the netherlands. We have a network with 5
> different schools (and 1 administration). Each of those have their own
> ip range in the private network (10.4.0.0 10.5.0.0 and so on).
> For all these schools we have an internet uplink of 2mbit. And this
> bandwidth should be shared as fairly as possible.
>
> So I started reading the the lartc HOWTO but was startled by the
> technical terms I found there...... I kinda understand what i
> meant..... but would like some advice which option I should further
> investigate.
>
> What I want to do is spit up the 2mbit pipe in 6. Guarantee 1/6 of the
> bandwidth per network and allowing more if it is availlable.
>
> Is this possible? If so which traffic control scheme should I
> investigate?
As was suggested, HTB is your friend, with perhaps an SFQ or ESFQ attached.
However, it's worth just ploughing on with the LARTC readme - at the end
of that you will be an expert in the subject, and it only looks hard
when you start (keep going and reread it).
For scripts, I think that this one is by far the best starting point.
It's got just about everything in, and although it's designed for a
single user, I think with the help of LARTC you can modify it for your
network, and the incoming part is really quite powerful
http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/
Good luck
Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth
2004-06-18 15:49 [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth Peter Kaagman
2004-06-18 16:07 ` Ben
2004-06-18 17:34 ` Ed Wildgoose
@ 2004-06-18 21:07 ` Peter Kaagman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Kaagman @ 2004-06-18 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Ben wrote:
>Yeah, look into HTB. It makes this problem easy.
>
>
>
Ok.... thank you both... will look into that subject
Peter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-18 21:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-18 15:49 [LARTC] Sharing bandwidth Peter Kaagman
2004-06-18 16:07 ` Ben
2004-06-18 17:34 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 21:07 ` Peter Kaagman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.