All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Likelihood of rt_tasks
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:00:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40EE6CC2.8070001@kolivas.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 888 bytes --]

A quick question about the usefulness of making rt_task() checks 
unlikely in sched-unlikely-rt_task.patch which is in -mm

quote:

diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~sched-unlikely-rt_task include/linux/sched.h
--- 25/include/linux/sched.h~sched-unlikely-rt_task	Fri Jul  2 16:33:01 2004
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/sched.h	Fri Jul  2 16:33:01 2004
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ struct signal_struct {

  #define MAX_PRIO		(MAX_RT_PRIO + 40)

-#define rt_task(p)		((p)->prio < MAX_RT_PRIO)
+#define rt_task(p)		(unlikely((p)->prio < MAX_RT_PRIO))

  /*
   * Some day this will be a full-fledged user tracking system..

---
While rt tasks are normally unlikely, what happens in the case when you 
are scheduling one or many running rt_tasks and the majority of your 
scheduling is rt? Would it be such a good idea in this setting that it 
is always hitting the slow path of branching all the time?

Con

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2004-07-09 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-09 10:00 Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-07-09 10:17 ` Likelihood of rt_tasks Ingo Molnar
2004-07-09 23:53 ` Peter Williams
2004-07-10  0:16   ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-10  0:41     ` Peter Williams
2004-07-10  0:45       ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-10 11:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-10 12:05       ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-10  3:57   ` Elladan
2004-07-10 11:19     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40EE6CC2.8070001@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.