All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Can't compile 1.2.11 because of dstlimit?
@ 2004-07-06 21:41 Bob McLaren
  2004-07-09 19:03 ` Bob McLaren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bob McLaren @ 2004-07-06 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I don't patch/recompile my kernels or applications very often so please 
let me know what I've done wrong here.

In order to take advantage of the 'time' match capability of iptables, I 
have upgraded from
iptables-1.2.8-8.72.3 on linux-2.4.20-18.7
to
iptables-1.2.11 on linux-2.4.20-18.7custom (enabled ipt_time)
(note: This is on a RedHat 7.3 box)

I have successfully recompiled my kernel.  But now, when I attempt to 
compile iptables, I get an error regarding "dstlimit".
I don't necessarily need dstlimit, so I tried disabling it in my kernel 
options (although I didn't recompile the kernel after that), but that 
doesn't seem to fix the problem.

Here is an extract of the error that I see when I run make for 
iptables.  ANY help or a point in the right direction would be greatly 
appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ld -shared  -o extensions/libipt_TRACE.so extensions/libipt_TRACE_sh.o
cc -O2 -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-18.7/include -Iinclude/ 
-DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.11\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_TTL_sh.o -c 
extensions/libipt_TTL.c
ld -shared  -o extensions/libipt_TTL.so extensions/libipt_TTL_sh.o
cc -O2 -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-18.7/include -Iinclude/ 
-DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.11\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_ULOG_sh.o -c 
extensions/libipt_ULOG.c
ld -shared  -o extensions/libipt_ULOG.so extensions/libipt_ULOG_sh.o
cc -O2 -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-18.7/include -Iinclude/ 
-DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.11\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_dstlimit_sh.o 
-c extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c: In function `init':
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c:104: structure has no member named `cfg'
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c:105: structure has no member named `cfg'
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c:106: structure has no member named `cfg'
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c: In function `parse':
extensions/libipt_dstlimit.c:138: structure has no member named `cfg'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Can't compile 1.2.11 because of dstlimit?
  2004-07-06 21:41 Can't compile 1.2.11 because of dstlimit? Bob McLaren
@ 2004-07-09 19:03 ` Bob McLaren
  2004-07-12  9:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bob McLaren @ 2004-07-09 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Bob McLaren wrote:

> ...
> I have successfully recompiled my kernel.  But now, when I attempt to 
> compile iptables, I get an error regarding "dstlimit".
> ...
>
Well, I'm closer to figuring it out...

I noticed that the ipt_dstlimit.h in my iptables source tree did not 
match the ipt_dstlimit.h in my kernel source tree.
The one in my kernel source tree does not define a "cfg" struct.  Which 
would explain the error I'm getting, but I still don't understand what I 
need to do to resolve this.

Why would both source trees have ipt_dstlimit.h files?
Why would my 2.4.20 kernel source tree have an outdated ipt_dstlimit.h file?
Can I just move my RedHat 7.3 box from 2.4.20 -> 2.6.7 without worry of 
bugs/issues?  I don't know how stable that new kernel is.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Can't compile 1.2.11 because of dstlimit?
  2004-07-09 19:03 ` Bob McLaren
@ 2004-07-12  9:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik @ 2004-07-12  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bob McLaren; +Cc: netfilter

Hi Bob,

On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Bob McLaren wrote:

> I noticed that the ipt_dstlimit.h in my iptables source tree did not
> match the ipt_dstlimit.h in my kernel source tree.
> The one in my kernel source tree does not define a "cfg" struct.  Which
> would explain the error I'm getting, but I still don't understand what I
> need to do to resolve this.
>
> Why would both source trees have ipt_dstlimit.h files?

No official kernel sources contain the ipt_dstlimit.h file.

The header file was added to the iptables source as forward-compatibility
until the dstlimit feature is submitted to the kernel.

> Why would my 2.4.20 kernel source tree have an outdated ipt_dstlimit.h file?

That's due to the RedHat policy on how to add and maintain features, which
hasn't yet been submitted into the official kernel.

> Can I just move my RedHat 7.3 box from 2.4.20 -> 2.6.7 without worry of
> bugs/issues?  I don't know how stable that new kernel is.

If you worry about the 2.6 kernel tree, you are free to use 2.4 - except
that use a standard kernel source release from kernel.org instead of a
vendor-specific one.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@sunserv.kfki.hu
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-12  9:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-06 21:41 Can't compile 1.2.11 because of dstlimit? Bob McLaren
2004-07-09 19:03 ` Bob McLaren
2004-07-12  9:51   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.