All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: Linux-Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:57:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F20C23.9050705@quark.didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org>

Brian Gerst wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but I suspect it's one of those possibly interfering. Looking at the
>>>>>>> patches in question I have no idea how they could do it. I guess 
>>>>>>> if you
>>>>>>> can try backing them out it would be helpful. Here are links to the
>>>>>>> patches in question.
>>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1100_ip_tabl 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> es.patch
>>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1105_CAN-200 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4-0497.patch
>>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1110_proc.pa 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Con, I'll try playing with those tomorrow (got no time 
>>>>>> tonight),
>>>>>> and report back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, got them all 3 backed out of 2.6.7-mm7 , but that doesn't change a
>>>>> thing. The JVM still dies when I try to run eclipse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can run Eclipse without any problems on 2.6.7-bk20-ck5 + few other 
>>>> not
>>>> related patches. Maybe try using non -mm? Try 2.6.7-bk20 and then try
>>>> reverting some patches. Maybe there is some other problem in -mm that
>>>> gives similar results?
>>>>
>>>
>>> with plain 2.6.7-bk20 I see the issue, same with 2.6.7-mm7. Reverting
>>> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@1.1743 from -mm7 fixes the
>>> issue. I'm currently building 2.6.7-bk20 minus that cset and I'll report
>>> back on the results of that in a few minutes.
>>>
>>
>> 2.6.7-bk20 minus the cset works.
>>
>> Testing with 2.6.8-rc1 and backing out one or both of the changes in the
>> cset I get these results :
>> 2.6.8-rc1       - vanilla                                       - 
>> breaks Java
>> 2.6.8-rc1-jju1  - both changes backed out                       - works
>> 2.6.8-rc1-jju2  - only first change (sys_rt_sigsuspend) applied - works
>> 2.6.8-rc1-jju3  - only second change (sys_sigaltstack) applied  - 
>> breaks Java
>>
>> -- 
>> Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
> 
> 
> Looks like a GCC (gcc version 3.4.1 20040702 (Red Hat Linux 3.4.1-2)) 
> screwup:
> 
> sys_sigaltstack:
>         movl    4(%esp), %eax
>         movl    8(%esp), %edx
>         movl    56(%esp), %ecx
>         jmp     do_sigaltstack
> 
> The offsets should be 4 more, to account for the return address on the 
> stack.

Nevermind, I should have looked more carefully.  The offsets are fine in 
my example.  What version of GCC are you using?

-- 
				Brian Gerst

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-05 23:11 post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java? Matthias Andree
2004-07-06 15:55 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 16:14   ` Matthias Andree
2004-07-06 17:49     ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 22:45     ` Andy Isaacson
2004-07-09 13:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-09 14:54   ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-09 16:37     ` José de Paula
2004-07-09 17:55     ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-10 11:41       ` Go Taniguchi
2004-07-11 15:16       ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-11 15:19         ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-11 15:35           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-11 15:35         ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-07-11 15:38           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12  0:56             ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12  3:20               ` Brian Gerst
2004-07-12  3:57                 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2004-07-12 11:01                   ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12 12:38                     ` Brian Gerst
2004-07-12 14:05                       ` Matthias Andree
2004-07-12 15:59                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 21:50                   ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-06 18:38 Ray Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F20C23.9050705@quark.didntduck.org \
    --to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
    --cc=kangur@polcom.net \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.