* [LARTC] Please document this
@ 2004-07-23 14:06 gypsy
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gypsy @ 2004-07-23 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Stephen,
This REALLY needs to be fixed in the code; tc should reject as a syntax
error any "add filter" command that does not include a "prio"
parameter. It also needs to be documented.
== From LARTC mailing list => Dear list,
> After much code crunching and beating my head against the wall
> (literally), I discovered the faulty code. Thanks mostly to gypsy who
> played a huge role in helping me discover the problem. My tc filter line
> had an error in it which completely baffles me because it worked up
> until 2045 lines were entered.
>
> Old command:
> tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 12: u32 ht 2:$table1: ht
> 3:$table2: match ip dst $ip/32 flowid 12:$classid
>
> New command:
> tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 12: prio 5 u32 ht 2:$table1:
> ht 3:$table2: match ip dst $ip/32 flowid 12:$classid
>
> Who would have thought that a prio would cause that much trouble?
Thanks,
gypsy
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-07-23 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-23 14:06 [LARTC] Please document this gypsy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.